Penal Theory and Penal Practice: The Implications of the Philosophy of Punishment for Criminal Justice Practice

This review surveys the main positions in contemporary debates about the justification of punishment and their implications for criminal justice practice. The first two sections explain the philosophy of punishment. Philosophy involves normative theorizing and rational reconstruction. Punishment is understood as criminal punishment: an institutional state practice imposing intentionally burdensome measures on those proved to have committed what the law defines as crimes. The third section sketches types of prospectivist and retrospectivist theory; the ways in which prospectivist and retrospectivist considerations can be combined; and the implications such theories have for criminal justice practice. The fourth section discusses a communicative theory and its implications for the ways in which offenders are addressed and for appropriate modes of punishment. The fifth section briefly explores some further implications concerning the political context of punishment. The final section discusses the interdependence between philosophy of criminal law and other disciplines such as criminology and history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Criminology
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-062526-045823
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Penal Theory and Penal Practice: The Implications of the Philosophy of Punishment for Criminal Justice Practice

Matt Matravers, Antony Duff
Annual Review of Criminology
Free Will and Agency
article

Penal Theory and Penal Practice: The Implications of the Philosophy of Punishment for Criminal Justice Practice

Matt Matravers, Antony Duff
article en

Abstract

This review surveys the main positions in contemporary debates about the justification of punishment and their implications for criminal justice practice. The first two sections explain the philosophy of punishment. Philosophy involves normative theorizing and rational reconstruction. Punishment is understood as criminal punishment: an institutional state practice imposing intentionally burdensome measures on those proved to have committed what the law defines as crimes. The third section sketches types of prospectivist and retrospectivist theory; the ways in which prospectivist and retrospectivist considerations can be combined; and the implications such theories have for criminal justice practice. The fourth section discusses a communicative theory and its implications for the ways in which offenders are addressed and for appropriate modes of punishment. The fifth section briefly explores some further implications concerning the political context of punishment. The final section discusses the interdependence between philosophy of criminal law and other disciplines such as criminology and history.

Annual Review of Criminology
University of Stirling (GB), University of York (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Free Will and Agency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Penal Theory and Penal Practice: The Implications of the Philosophy of Punishment for Criminal Justice Practice — Matt Matravers, Antony Duff · Annual Review of Criminology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS