Content and Usefulness of YouTube Videos on Oil Pulling: A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective:The increasing use of social media as a source of health information has raised concerns regarding the scientific accuracy of online educational content. This study aimed to evaluate the content and usefulness of Turkish- and English-language YouTube™ videos related to oil pulling and to compare their educational value according to upload source.Materials and Methods:In this cross-sectional study, a YouTube™ search using the keyword “oil pulling” was performed on May 21, 2021. The first 305 videos retrieved using the default search settings were screened, and 178 eligible videos were included in the analysis. Video duration, upload year, numbers of views, likes, dislikes, and upload sources were recorded. Content was evaluated using a predefined 10-item usefulness scoring system, and videos were classified as not useful, slightly useful, useful, or highly useful. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Spearman's correlation analysis, and Cohen's kappa coefficient.Results:Among the 178 analyzed videos, 60.7% were classified as useful and 21.9% as highly useful. Verbal explanation of the procedure (94.9%) and information regarding oral health effects (92.1%) were the most frequently presented content items, whereas references to scientific evidence were identified in only 17.4% of videos. Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals demonstrated significantly higher educational usefulness than those uploaded by individual users or websites. No significant correlations were found between usefulness scores and video popularity indicators, including views, likes, dislikes, or upload year (p > 0.05). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect (Cohen’s κ = 0.935).Conclusion:Although most YouTube™ videos on oil pulling provided useful educational information, evidence-based content remained limited. Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals demonstrated superior educational value, while viewer popularity did not reflect scientific quality. Greater involvement of oral healthcare professionals and academic institutions in producing evidence-based digital educational content may help improve oral health literacy and reduce misinformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1988337
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Content and Usefulness of YouTube Videos on Oil Pulling: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sema Yazıcı Akbıyık, Meryem Toraman Alkurt, İlkay Peker, Dilara HAROĞLU et al.
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Content and Usefulness of YouTube Videos on Oil Pulling: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sema Yazıcı Akbıyık, Meryem Toraman Alkurt, İlkay Peker, Dilara HAROĞLU, Kübra Taka
article en

Abstract

Objective:The increasing use of social media as a source of health information has raised concerns regarding the scientific accuracy of online educational content. This study aimed to evaluate the content and usefulness of Turkish- and English-language YouTube™ videos related to oil pulling and to compare their educational value according to upload source.Materials and Methods:In this cross-sectional study, a YouTube™ search using the keyword “oil pulling” was performed on May 21, 2021. The first 305 videos retrieved using the default search settings were screened, and 178 eligible videos were included in the analysis. Video duration, upload year, numbers of views, likes, dislikes, and upload sources were recorded. Content was evaluated using a predefined 10-item usefulness scoring system, and videos were classified as not useful, slightly useful, useful, or highly useful. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Spearman's correlation analysis, and Cohen's kappa coefficient.Results:Among the 178 analyzed videos, 60.7% were classified as useful and 21.9% as highly useful. Verbal explanation of the procedure (94.9%) and information regarding oral health effects (92.1%) were the most frequently presented content items, whereas references to scientific evidence were identified in only 17.4% of videos. Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals demonstrated significantly higher educational usefulness than those uploaded by individual users or websites. No significant correlations were found between usefulness scores and video popularity indicators, including views, likes, dislikes, or upload year (p > 0.05). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect (Cohen’s κ = 0.935).Conclusion:Although most YouTube™ videos on oil pulling provided useful educational information, evidence-based content remained limited. Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals demonstrated superior educational value, while viewer popularity did not reflect scientific quality. Greater involvement of oral healthcare professionals and academic institutions in producing evidence-based digital educational content may help improve oral health literacy and reduce misinformation.

Cumhuriyet Dental JournalVol. 29(3)
Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.