Patient-Reported Outcomes of Mirogabalin in Patients with Postoperative Spinal Cord-Related Central Neuropathic Pain Inadequately Controlled with Conventional Gabapentinoids: A Retrospective Real-World Study

Objective: This single-center, observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of switching to mirogabalin in patients with residual spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain that persisted despite conventional gabapentinoid therapy (gabapentin or pregabalin). Methods: Electronic medical records of 41 patients who switched from pregabalin or gabapentin to mirogabalin between November 2023 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Analgesic effectiveness was primarily assessed using the patient-reported percentage of pain reduction. Clinically meaningful and substantial pain reduction were defined as ≥ 30% and ≥ 50%, respectively. Safety was evaluated by assessing the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Results: The mean baseline numerical rating scale score was 3.93 ± 1.75. Among the 41 patients included in the study, the interval between surgery and the first switch to mirogabalin was available for 35 patients. The median interval between surgery and switching to mirogabalin was 411 days (IQR, 88-743; range, 27-2091 days). Overall, 53.7% and 46.3% of patients achieved clinically meaningful (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) pain reduction, respectively, after switching to mirogabalin. AEs were reported in 31.7% of patients, with the most common being somnolence (12.2%), dizziness (7.3%), and weight gain (7.3%). All reported AEs were mild to moderate in severity. Consequently, 19.5% and 22.0% of patients discontinued mirogabalin and resumed their previous medication because of insufficient efficacy and AEs, respectively. For the secondary analysis, patients were divided according to disease etiology (spinal cord tumor vs. non-tumoral myelopathy). Clinically meaningful pain reduction was achieved in 60.0% and 47.6% of patients, respectively, with no significant difference in responder rates between the two groups. Conclusion: Although the findings may overestimate treatment effectiveness because of the retrospective design and reliance on subjective patient assessment, switching to mirogabalin provided additional clinically meaningful pain relief in approximately half of the patients with persistent postoperative spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain that was inadequately controlled with conventional gabapentinoids. These findings suggest that mirogabalin may represent a promising alternative treatment option for patients with residual spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain who have limited therapeutic options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2026.0149
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Mirogabalin in Patients with Postoperative Spinal Cord-Related Central Neuropathic Pain Inadequately Controlled with Conventional Gabapentinoids: A Retrospective Real-World Study

Dong Wook Kim, Sang Hoon Hwang, Danbi Park, Jin Hoon Park
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Mirogabalin in Patients with Postoperative Spinal Cord-Related Central Neuropathic Pain Inadequately Controlled with Conventional Gabapentinoids: A Retrospective Real-World Study

Dong Wook Kim, Sang Hoon Hwang, Danbi Park, Jin Hoon Park
article en

Abstract

Objective: This single-center, observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of switching to mirogabalin in patients with residual spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain that persisted despite conventional gabapentinoid therapy (gabapentin or pregabalin). Methods: Electronic medical records of 41 patients who switched from pregabalin or gabapentin to mirogabalin between November 2023 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Analgesic effectiveness was primarily assessed using the patient-reported percentage of pain reduction. Clinically meaningful and substantial pain reduction were defined as ≥ 30% and ≥ 50%, respectively. Safety was evaluated by assessing the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Results: The mean baseline numerical rating scale score was 3.93 ± 1.75. Among the 41 patients included in the study, the interval between surgery and the first switch to mirogabalin was available for 35 patients. The median interval between surgery and switching to mirogabalin was 411 days (IQR, 88-743; range, 27-2091 days). Overall, 53.7% and 46.3% of patients achieved clinically meaningful (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) pain reduction, respectively, after switching to mirogabalin. AEs were reported in 31.7% of patients, with the most common being somnolence (12.2%), dizziness (7.3%), and weight gain (7.3%). All reported AEs were mild to moderate in severity. Consequently, 19.5% and 22.0% of patients discontinued mirogabalin and resumed their previous medication because of insufficient efficacy and AEs, respectively. For the secondary analysis, patients were divided according to disease etiology (spinal cord tumor vs. non-tumoral myelopathy). Clinically meaningful pain reduction was achieved in 60.0% and 47.6% of patients, respectively, with no significant difference in responder rates between the two groups. Conclusion: Although the findings may overestimate treatment effectiveness because of the retrospective design and reliance on subjective patient assessment, switching to mirogabalin provided additional clinically meaningful pain relief in approximately half of the patients with persistent postoperative spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain that was inadequately controlled with conventional gabapentinoids. These findings suggest that mirogabalin may represent a promising alternative treatment option for patients with residual spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain who have limited therapeutic options.

Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
Korea University (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.