Improving interprofessional competencies and relational coordination through longitudinal tele-teams: a mixed methods study

Preparing health professions students for collaborative practice remains a priority in medical education, yet many interprofessional education (IPE) models are short-term and lack authentic clinical context or robust evaluation of team functioning. This study examined whether a longitudinal tele-team model, pairing interprofessional student teams with stroke survivors, enhances collaborative competencies and relational coordination over time. A convergent mixed methods design was used. Thirty-two health professions students from physical therapy, occupational therapy, medical nutrition and speech-language pathology participated in six longitudinal tele-team sessions with community-dwelling stroke survivors. Quantitative outcomes included the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS), administered as a retrospective pre–post measure, and the Relational Coordination Survey (RCS), collected after each session. Stroke survivors completed the Patient Insights and Views Observing Team (PIVOT) survey at mid- and end-points. Linear mixed-effects modeling assessed changes in RCS scores; paired t-tests evaluated ICCAS differences; and correlations examined relationships between measures. Qualitative student focus group data were analyzed and integrated with quantitative findings. Students demonstrated significant improvements across all ICCAS domains ( p < 0.05), indicating enhanced perceived interprofessional competencies. RCS scores showed a significant positive trajectory over time (β = 0.06, SE = 0.016, p < 0.001), reflecting strengthening communication and relational dynamics within teams. Higher RCS scores were moderately to strongly correlated with ICCAS domains, particularly communication, patient-centered care, and conflict management ( r > 0.62). Stroke survivors reported significant improvements in team functioning on the PIVOT survey ( p = 0.031). Qualitative analysis yielded five themes highlighting the value of learning from patient experience, role clarification, relationship-building, the importance of longitudinal engagement, and the feasibility of the tele-team model. A longitudinal tele-team model was associated with significant improvements in interprofessional competencies and relational coordination among health professions students. Findings suggest that combining authentic, community-engaged experiences with repeated team interaction and structured reflection supports both individual competency development and team-level functioning, and integration of complementary measures such as ICCAS and RCS provides a more comprehensive evaluation of team development. This model offers a scalable approach for advancing collaborative practice readiness in health professions education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10472-8
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Improving interprofessional competencies and relational coordination through longitudinal tele-teams: a mixed methods study

Gail M. Jensen, Elizabeth L. Beam, Teresa M. Cochran, Kathleen G. Volkman et al.
BMC Medical Education
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Improving interprofessional competencies and relational coordination through longitudinal tele-teams: a mixed methods study

Gail M. Jensen, Elizabeth L. Beam, Teresa M. Cochran, Kathleen G. Volkman, Lou Jensen, Miechelle McKelvey, Victoria Kennel
article en

Abstract

Preparing health professions students for collaborative practice remains a priority in medical education, yet many interprofessional education (IPE) models are short-term and lack authentic clinical context or robust evaluation of team functioning. This study examined whether a longitudinal tele-team model, pairing interprofessional student teams with stroke survivors, enhances collaborative competencies and relational coordination over time. A convergent mixed methods design was used. Thirty-two health professions students from physical therapy, occupational therapy, medical nutrition and speech-language pathology participated in six longitudinal tele-team sessions with community-dwelling stroke survivors. Quantitative outcomes included the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS), administered as a retrospective pre–post measure, and the Relational Coordination Survey (RCS), collected after each session. Stroke survivors completed the Patient Insights and Views Observing Team (PIVOT) survey at mid- and end-points. Linear mixed-effects modeling assessed changes in RCS scores; paired t-tests evaluated ICCAS differences; and correlations examined relationships between measures. Qualitative student focus group data were analyzed and integrated with quantitative findings. Students demonstrated significant improvements across all ICCAS domains ( p < 0.05), indicating enhanced perceived interprofessional competencies. RCS scores showed a significant positive trajectory over time (β = 0.06, SE = 0.016, p < 0.001), reflecting strengthening communication and relational dynamics within teams. Higher RCS scores were moderately to strongly correlated with ICCAS domains, particularly communication, patient-centered care, and conflict management ( r > 0.62). Stroke survivors reported significant improvements in team functioning on the PIVOT survey ( p = 0.031). Qualitative analysis yielded five themes highlighting the value of learning from patient experience, role clarification, relationship-building, the importance of longitudinal engagement, and the feasibility of the tele-team model. A longitudinal tele-team model was associated with significant improvements in interprofessional competencies and relational coordination among health professions students. Findings suggest that combining authentic, community-engaged experiences with repeated team interaction and structured reflection supports both individual competency development and team-level functioning, and integration of complementary measures such as ICCAS and RCS provides a more comprehensive evaluation of team development. This model offers a scalable approach for advancing collaborative practice readiness in health professions education.

BMC Medical Education
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Creighton University (US), Nebraska Medical Center (US), University of Nebraska at Kearney (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.