Phase II Study of Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Plus Necitumumab for Squamous NSCLC After ICI‐Platinum Therapy (WJOG14120L)

ABSTRACT Treatment options remain limited for unresectable or advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSqCC) that progresses after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)‐based therapy. Although combination therapy with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and necitumumab (CGN) represents a potential second‐line regimen, no prospective data in a post‐ICI setting have been reported. This open‐label, multicenter single‐arm Phase II study enrolled patients with LSqCC after platinum‐based chemotherapy plus ICI, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), with the null and alternative hypotheses set at 23% and 40%, respectively. Secondary endpoints included the disease‐control rate (DCR), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the impact of platinum‐free interval (PFI), eligibility for anti‐angiogenic therapies, and safety. Forty‐six patients were evaluable for efficacy. ORR was 26.1% (80% CI, 17.7–36.2) and DCR was 87.0% (95% CI, 73.7–95.1). Median PFS and OS were 4.4 months (95% CI, 4.1–5.5) and 12.2 months (95% CI, 9.4–15.2), respectively. Common adverse events included hematological toxicities, acneiform rash, and hypomagnesemia. No pneumonitis or treatment‐related deaths were observed. The safety profile was consistent across prior treatment types and anti‐angiogenic therapies eligibility. PFI analysis showed that longer PFI durations were associated with improvements in PFS and OS, and the optimal PFI cutoff value was approximately 4 months. Although the predefined response threshold was not met, CGN demonstrated modest antitumor activity with a high DCR and a manageable toxicity after ICI‐based therapy. CGN may be a feasible treatment option for second‐line after ICI‐based therapy, including for patients unsuitable for anti‐angiogenic therapies, although further validation is warranted. Trial Registration: jRCTs051200138

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Science
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70553
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Phase II Study of Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Plus Necitumumab for Squamous NSCLC After ICI‐Platinum Therapy (WJOG14120L)

Teppei Yamaguchi, Hiroshige Yoshioka, Koichi Azuma, Hiroaki Kanemura et al.
Cancer Science
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Phase II Study of Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Plus Necitumumab for Squamous NSCLC After ICI‐Platinum Therapy (WJOG14120L)

Teppei Yamaguchi, Hiroshige Yoshioka, Koichi Azuma, Hiroaki Kanemura, Takayasu Kurata, Hiroshi Handa, Haruko Daga, Nobuhisa Ishikawa, Hiroaki Akamatsu, Yukihiro Toi, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Yosuke Tamura, M Yamaguchi, Keita Mori, Yuki Sato, Nobuyuki Yamamoto
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Treatment options remain limited for unresectable or advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSqCC) that progresses after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)‐based therapy. Although combination therapy with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and necitumumab (CGN) represents a potential second‐line regimen, no prospective data in a post‐ICI setting have been reported. This open‐label, multicenter single‐arm Phase II study enrolled patients with LSqCC after platinum‐based chemotherapy plus ICI, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), with the null and alternative hypotheses set at 23% and 40%, respectively. Secondary endpoints included the disease‐control rate (DCR), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the impact of platinum‐free interval (PFI), eligibility for anti‐angiogenic therapies, and safety. Forty‐six patients were evaluable for efficacy. ORR was 26.1% (80% CI, 17.7–36.2) and DCR was 87.0% (95% CI, 73.7–95.1). Median PFS and OS were 4.4 months (95% CI, 4.1–5.5) and 12.2 months (95% CI, 9.4–15.2), respectively. Common adverse events included hematological toxicities, acneiform rash, and hypomagnesemia. No pneumonitis or treatment‐related deaths were observed. The safety profile was consistent across prior treatment types and anti‐angiogenic therapies eligibility. PFI analysis showed that longer PFI durations were associated with improvements in PFS and OS, and the optimal PFI cutoff value was approximately 4 months. Although the predefined response threshold was not met, CGN demonstrated modest antitumor activity with a high DCR and a manageable toxicity after ICI‐based therapy. CGN may be a feasible treatment option for second‐line after ICI‐based therapy, including for patients unsuitable for anti‐angiogenic therapies, although further validation is warranted. Trial Registration: jRCTs051200138

Cancer Science
Kurume University (JP), Kansai Medical University (JP), St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP), Wakayama Medical University (JP), Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP), National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center (JP), Osaka City General Hospital (JP), Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital (JP), Aichi Cancer Center (JP), Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center (JP), Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital (JP), Sendai Kousei Hospital (JP), Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences (JP), Kindai University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.