Deep Learning Analysis of Routine Preoperative Knee Radiographs for Five-Year Prediction of Contralateral Arthroplasty

Background: Before unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the contralateral radiograph is reduced to a Kellgren–Lawrence grade. We asked what the image adds, what the model reads, and how many views are needed. Methods: A multi-view DenseNet121 survival network predicted 5-year contralateral arthroplasty from routine radiographs, against Cox models over 11 clinical variables with and without the dataset-inferred grade, on a once-read test split. Results: In 741 test patients (106 events), the primary contrast put the combined model’s 5-year censoring-weighted AUROC at 0.844 against the clinical model’s 0.680 among the 740 patients that received both scores (difference 0.164, 0.087 to 0.240). Post hoc, a frontal radiograph alone read 0.837, matching the multi-view arms because 56.6% had only a frontal film; withholding lateral and sunrise views cost 0.078 (0.012 to 0.142) in the 315 patients with both. Grad-CAM put 37.8% of attribution in a joint region covering 25.0%; occluding it left 0.800. Conclusions: The preoperative radiograph adds prognostic information beyond the clinical record. Exploratory analyses place almost all of it in one frontal film and beyond an automated grade, not a radiologist’s read. These internal analyses require external validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Imaging
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12100474
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Deep Learning Analysis of Routine Preoperative Knee Radiographs for Five-Year Prediction of Contralateral Arthroplasty

Joshua Ong, Rohan A. Phadke, Alireza Tavakkoli, Ajay Tripuraneni et al.
Journal of Imaging
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Deep Learning Analysis of Routine Preoperative Knee Radiographs for Five-Year Prediction of Contralateral Arthroplasty

Joshua Ong, Rohan A. Phadke, Alireza Tavakkoli, Ajay Tripuraneni, James Rizkalla, Samer G. Salman, Sainyam Galhotra, Zane G. Salman, Sai M. Yedupati, Ryan Zeitouny
article en

Abstract

Background: Before unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the contralateral radiograph is reduced to a Kellgren–Lawrence grade. We asked what the image adds, what the model reads, and how many views are needed. Methods: A multi-view DenseNet121 survival network predicted 5-year contralateral arthroplasty from routine radiographs, against Cox models over 11 clinical variables with and without the dataset-inferred grade, on a once-read test split. Results: In 741 test patients (106 events), the primary contrast put the combined model’s 5-year censoring-weighted AUROC at 0.844 against the clinical model’s 0.680 among the 740 patients that received both scores (difference 0.164, 0.087 to 0.240). Post hoc, a frontal radiograph alone read 0.837, matching the multi-view arms because 56.6% had only a frontal film; withholding lateral and sunrise views cost 0.078 (0.012 to 0.142) in the 315 patients with both. Grad-CAM put 37.8% of attribution in a joint region covering 25.0%; occluding it left 0.800. Conclusions: The preoperative radiograph adds prognostic information beyond the clinical record. Exploratory analyses place almost all of it in one frontal film and beyond an automated grade, not a radiologist’s read. These internal analyses require external validation.

Journal of ImagingVol. 12(10)
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US), University of Nevada, Reno (US), Harvard University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Cornell University (US), Baylor University Medical Center (US), University of Cincinnati (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.