Costs of Delivering the Hep B PAST Model of Care in Remote Australia: A Retrospective Pre–Post Study

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct medical costs of the Hep B Partnership Program (Hep B PAST) model of care compared with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) usual care from the health system perspective (Northern Territory (NT) Department of Health and the Commonwealth). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective cohort study (2014-2023) that linked primary care with inpatient, emergency, outpatient and outreach datasets. Costs were applied using National Weighted Activity Units, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and NT Government costings. A pre- and post-implementation design from a health system perspective was applied, with costs in 2023 Australian dollars. SETTING: Remote communities in the NT, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort included all First Nations people living with CHB who were attending a clinic in a remote community that had consented to the Hep B PAST program, and who received care between 1 July 2014 and 31 May 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual mean and median healthcare costs per contact and per individual across service types, with comparisons of annual mean costs per individual between pre- and post-Hep B PAST using partially overlapping t-tests. RESULTS: Among 1063 First Nations individuals with CHB, annual median costs per individual were similar for usual care ($639 [interquartile range, $366-1156]) and Hep B PAST ($770 [interquartile range, $400-1272]); mean costs were also similar for usual care versus Hep B PAST ($1701 vs. $1970; p = 0.12). By service type, annual median costs were similar for inpatient services ($7777 vs. $7795), primary care ($327 vs. $302) and outpatient visits ($1985 vs. $1858), and higher for Hep B PAST for emergency services ($1339 vs. $1672) and outreach care ($373 vs. $746). CONCLUSIONS: In remote First Nations communities, Hep B PAST was delivered with a modest increase in direct medical costs compared with usual care. These findings can be used to inform future cost-effective evaluations. Future cost savings from decreased hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure were not included.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Medical Journal of Australia
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70292
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Costs of Delivering the Hep B PAST Model of Care in Remote Australia: A Retrospective Pre–Post Study

Andrew John Palmer, Joshua Saul Davis, Yuejen Zhao, Paula Binks et al.
The Medical Journal of Australia
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Costs of Delivering the Hep B PAST Model of Care in Remote Australia: A Retrospective Pre–Post Study

Andrew John Palmer, Joshua Saul Davis, Yuejen Zhao, Paula Binks, Elizabeth Robinson, Emily Vintour‐Cesar, Nicola Jane Stephens, Melita McKinnon, Barbara de Graaff, Julie A. Campbell, Jane Davies, Peter Nihill, Hoa Nguyen, Karen Wills, Anh Le Tuan Nguyen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct medical costs of the Hep B Partnership Program (Hep B PAST) model of care compared with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) usual care from the health system perspective (Northern Territory (NT) Department of Health and the Commonwealth). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective cohort study (2014-2023) that linked primary care with inpatient, emergency, outpatient and outreach datasets. Costs were applied using National Weighted Activity Units, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and NT Government costings. A pre- and post-implementation design from a health system perspective was applied, with costs in 2023 Australian dollars. SETTING: Remote communities in the NT, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort included all First Nations people living with CHB who were attending a clinic in a remote community that had consented to the Hep B PAST program, and who received care between 1 July 2014 and 31 May 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual mean and median healthcare costs per contact and per individual across service types, with comparisons of annual mean costs per individual between pre- and post-Hep B PAST using partially overlapping t-tests. RESULTS: Among 1063 First Nations individuals with CHB, annual median costs per individual were similar for usual care ($639 [interquartile range, $366-1156]) and Hep B PAST ($770 [interquartile range, $400-1272]); mean costs were also similar for usual care versus Hep B PAST ($1701 vs. $1970; p = 0.12). By service type, annual median costs were similar for inpatient services ($7777 vs. $7795), primary care ($327 vs. $302) and outpatient visits ($1985 vs. $1858), and higher for Hep B PAST for emergency services ($1339 vs. $1672) and outreach care ($373 vs. $746). CONCLUSIONS: In remote First Nations communities, Hep B PAST was delivered with a modest increase in direct medical costs compared with usual care. These findings can be used to inform future cost-effective evaluations. Future cost savings from decreased hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure were not included.

The Medical Journal of AustraliaVol. 224(10)
University of Tasmania (AU), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Hanoi Medical University (VN), Menzies School of Health Research (AU), Government of the Northern Territory (AU), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), Northern Territory Health Services (AU), Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.