Costs of Delivering the Hep B PAST Model of Care in Remote Australia: A Retrospective Pre–Post Study
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct medical costs of the Hep B Partnership Program (Hep B PAST) model of care compared with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) usual care from the health system perspective (Northern Territory (NT) Department of Health and the Commonwealth). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective cohort study (2014-2023) that linked primary care with inpatient, emergency, outpatient and outreach datasets. Costs were applied using National Weighted Activity Units, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and NT Government costings. A pre- and post-implementation design from a health system perspective was applied, with costs in 2023 Australian dollars. SETTING: Remote communities in the NT, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort included all First Nations people living with CHB who were attending a clinic in a remote community that had consented to the Hep B PAST program, and who received care between 1 July 2014 and 31 May 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual mean and median healthcare costs per contact and per individual across service types, with comparisons of annual mean costs per individual between pre- and post-Hep B PAST using partially overlapping t-tests. RESULTS: Among 1063 First Nations individuals with CHB, annual median costs per individual were similar for usual care ($639 [interquartile range, $366-1156]) and Hep B PAST ($770 [interquartile range, $400-1272]); mean costs were also similar for usual care versus Hep B PAST ($1701 vs. $1970; p = 0.12). By service type, annual median costs were similar for inpatient services ($7777 vs. $7795), primary care ($327 vs. $302) and outpatient visits ($1985 vs. $1858), and higher for Hep B PAST for emergency services ($1339 vs. $1672) and outreach care ($373 vs. $746). CONCLUSIONS: In remote First Nations communities, Hep B PAST was delivered with a modest increase in direct medical costs compared with usual care. These findings can be used to inform future cost-effective evaluations. Future cost savings from decreased hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure were not included.
Authors
- Andrew John Palmer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9703-7891)
- Joshua Saul Davis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9864-5699)
- Yuejen Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5775-4503)
- Paula Binks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4844-9408)
- Elizabeth Robinson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7087-5895)
- Emily Vintour‐Cesar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8555-2772)
- Nicola Jane Stephens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-4581)
- Melita McKinnon
- Barbara de Graaff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-9561)
- Julie A. Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1820-6758)
- Jane Davies (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-837X)
- Peter Nihill
- Hoa Nguyen
- Karen Wills
- Anh Le Tuan Nguyen
Institutions
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- Hanoi Medical University (VN)
- Menzies School of Health Research (AU)
- Government of the Northern Territory (AU)
- Peter Doherty Institute (AU)
- Northern Territory Health Services (AU)
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Medical Journal of Australia
- Published
- 2026-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70292
- Primary Topic
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00