Exclusion by Design: Regulatory Reform and Evolving Frameworks for Clinical Trials in Pregnancy

Maternal–fetal pharmacology remains a critically underdeveloped domain, largely because ethical, regulatory, and methodological barriers impede evidence generation in pregnant populations (hereafter women). Pregnant women continue to be routinely excluded from clinical trials, creating both a knowledge and an evidence gap that can adversely affect maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite significant regulatory advances in both encouraging trial inclusion and improving labeling [ 1 ], for example through the implementation of the US Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule, substantial gaps and a lack of harmonization persist in pharmacologic, safety, and efficacy data for medications used during pregnancy and lactation. This targeted commentary examines the current state of medication use in pregnant women and their fetuses, the regulatory landscape, and the challenges that impede the development of new research in maternal–fetal pharmacology. We also identify the regulatory conundrum in selected countries worldwide and propose new strategies to improve evidence generation and regulatory decision making for this protected population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Drugs
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-026-00779-w
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Exclusion by Design: Regulatory Reform and Evolving Frameworks for Clinical Trials in Pregnancy

Gregory L. Kearns, Agnès Saint-Raymond
Pediatric Drugs
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
article

Exclusion by Design: Regulatory Reform and Evolving Frameworks for Clinical Trials in Pregnancy

Gregory L. Kearns, Agnès Saint-Raymond
article en

Abstract

Maternal–fetal pharmacology remains a critically underdeveloped domain, largely because ethical, regulatory, and methodological barriers impede evidence generation in pregnant populations (hereafter women). Pregnant women continue to be routinely excluded from clinical trials, creating both a knowledge and an evidence gap that can adversely affect maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite significant regulatory advances in both encouraging trial inclusion and improving labeling [ 1 ], for example through the implementation of the US Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule, substantial gaps and a lack of harmonization persist in pharmacologic, safety, and efficacy data for medications used during pregnancy and lactation. This targeted commentary examines the current state of medication use in pregnant women and their fetuses, the regulatory landscape, and the challenges that impede the development of new research in maternal–fetal pharmacology. We also identify the regulatory conundrum in selected countries worldwide and propose new strategies to improve evidence generation and regulatory decision making for this protected population.

Pediatric Drugs
Texas Christian University (US), Concept Foundation (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pregnancy and Medication Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exclusion by Design: Regulatory Reform and Evolving Frameworks for Clinical Trials in Pregnancy — Gregory L. Kearns, Agnès Saint-Raymond · Pediatric Drugs (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS