Two-to-one randomization is associated with increased control-arm patient withdrawal.

Patient withdrawal from a randomized clinical trial before starting the study treatment complicates the interpretation of the trial results, especially if a larger proportion patients withdraw from the control-treatment arm than the experimental-treatment arm. This may happen in an open-label trial if the patients are disappointed with their treatment assignment. It has been hypothesized that two-to-one randomization may lead to more disappointment withdrawals. To investigate this, we examined a cohort of 396 published oncology trials from four journals (2022-2025) to assess the differential pre-treatment withdrawal rates. We found that in 35 open-label trials with two-to-one randomization patients were, on average, 3.72 times more likely to withdraw on the control-treatment arm (95% CI = 2.66 to 5.22). This is a larger relative risk than was seen in the 181 open-label trials with one-to-one randomization, 1.99 (95% CI = 1.67 to 2.37). To avoid differential withdrawal, trials should be blinded when possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag351
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Two-to-one randomization is associated with increased control-arm patient withdrawal.

Boris Freidlin, Edward L. Korn
PubMed
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Two-to-one randomization is associated with increased control-arm patient withdrawal.

Boris Freidlin, Edward L. Korn
article en

Abstract

Patient withdrawal from a randomized clinical trial before starting the study treatment complicates the interpretation of the trial results, especially if a larger proportion patients withdraw from the control-treatment arm than the experimental-treatment arm. This may happen in an open-label trial if the patients are disappointed with their treatment assignment. It has been hypothesized that two-to-one randomization may lead to more disappointment withdrawals. To investigate this, we examined a cohort of 396 published oncology trials from four journals (2022-2025) to assess the differential pre-treatment withdrawal rates. We found that in 35 open-label trials with two-to-one randomization patients were, on average, 3.72 times more likely to withdraw on the control-treatment arm (95% CI = 2.66 to 5.22). This is a larger relative risk than was seen in the 181 open-label trials with one-to-one randomization, 1.99 (95% CI = 1.67 to 2.37). To avoid differential withdrawal, trials should be blinded when possible.

PubMed
National Cancer Institute (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two-to-one randomization is associated with increased control-arm patient withdrawal. — Boris Freidlin, Edward L. Korn · PubMed (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS