Digital intervention to reduce minority stress in sexual and gender minority populations: a pilot feasibility and usability study

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention (iACT) for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other sexually and gender diverse (LGBTQIA+) individuals, while exploring preliminary changes in minority stress and wellbeing-related outcomes. We conducted a four-week pilot study with randomized pre-post design of a self-help iACT program adapted for LGBTQIA+ individuals. Data were collected between June and September 2025. Participants ( N = 85; experimental n = 35, control n = 50) completed baseline and post-intervention assessments of depression, anxiety, stress, psychological flexibility, emotion regulation, minority stress, resilience, and usability. The program demonstrated excellent usability. Participant feedback indicated that the intervention was perceived as useful, accessible, and affirming, promoting self-acceptance, introspection, and reflection. Qualitative feedback also identified limitations, including tasks perceived as overly guided or repetitive, lengthy audio materials, and limited personalization. Exploratory analyses showed that participants in the experimental group demonstrated significant pre-post improvements in psychological distress, stress, emotional clarity, goal-directed behavior, and anticipated discrimination, which survived correction for multiple comparisons, with small-to-large effect sizes. Between-group comparisons favored the experimental group on stress, emotional clarity, and anticipated discrimination, with small-to-medium effect sizes, although these differences did not remain significant after correction. A key limitation was the high and uneven attrition rate (51.4% in the experimental group vs. 15.3% in controls), which warrants caution in interpreting exploratory outcome findings. Overall, findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a self-help iACT program tailored for LGBTQIA+ individuals and suggest preliminary changes in stress, minority stress, and emotion regulation. These results may inform future trials evaluating queer-affirmative digital interventions for individuals facing stigma, non-disclosure, or structural barriers to care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-70953-0
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Digital intervention to reduce minority stress in sexual and gender minority populations: a pilot feasibility and usability study

Andrea Garolla, Paolo Meneguzzo, Marina Miscioscia, Marina Bonato et al.
Scientific Reports
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Digital intervention to reduce minority stress in sexual and gender minority populations: a pilot feasibility and usability study

Andrea Garolla, Paolo Meneguzzo, Marina Miscioscia, Marina Bonato, Bonzanini Martina, Alberto Scala
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention (iACT) for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other sexually and gender diverse (LGBTQIA+) individuals, while exploring preliminary changes in minority stress and wellbeing-related outcomes. We conducted a four-week pilot study with randomized pre-post design of a self-help iACT program adapted for LGBTQIA+ individuals. Data were collected between June and September 2025. Participants ( N = 85; experimental n = 35, control n = 50) completed baseline and post-intervention assessments of depression, anxiety, stress, psychological flexibility, emotion regulation, minority stress, resilience, and usability. The program demonstrated excellent usability. Participant feedback indicated that the intervention was perceived as useful, accessible, and affirming, promoting self-acceptance, introspection, and reflection. Qualitative feedback also identified limitations, including tasks perceived as overly guided or repetitive, lengthy audio materials, and limited personalization. Exploratory analyses showed that participants in the experimental group demonstrated significant pre-post improvements in psychological distress, stress, emotional clarity, goal-directed behavior, and anticipated discrimination, which survived correction for multiple comparisons, with small-to-large effect sizes. Between-group comparisons favored the experimental group on stress, emotional clarity, and anticipated discrimination, with small-to-medium effect sizes, although these differences did not remain significant after correction. A key limitation was the high and uneven attrition rate (51.4% in the experimental group vs. 15.3% in controls), which warrants caution in interpreting exploratory outcome findings. Overall, findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a self-help iACT program tailored for LGBTQIA+ individuals and suggest preliminary changes in stress, minority stress, and emotion regulation. These results may inform future trials evaluating queer-affirmative digital interventions for individuals facing stigma, non-disclosure, or structural barriers to care.

Scientific Reports
University of Padua (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.