Visible Trends, Submerged Dynamics: A Multi‐Layered Science Mapping of Corporate Sustainable Development Goals Reporting

ABSTRACT This study conducts a bibliometric analysis and science mapping to trace the intellectual structure of corporate sustainability reporting concerning the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Reviewing 121 Web of Science articles published in 2015–2024, we overlay bibliographic coupling with co‐citation and co‐word analysis. Drawing on an integrative framework combining legitimacy, institutional and governance perspectives, we examine two propositions: that institutional contexts are reflected in thematic specialisation and that the field is moving from a rationale‐driven towards an implementation‐driven phase. The evidence is consistent with both. The analysis identifies five thematic clusters and three semantic domains, tracing a shift from adoption and legitimation towards disclosure quality, governance and measurement and shows that cluster membership is associated with the institutional setting of the underlying research. It also identifies under‐explored areas, including SMEs, sectoral heterogeneity, assurance and the near‐absence of research on market‐driven regimes. Bibliometric proximity indicates intellectual closeness rather than causal relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70994
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Visible Trends, Submerged Dynamics: A Multi‐Layered Science Mapping of Corporate Sustainable Development Goals Reporting

Paola Musile Tanzi, Simone Terzani, Marco Avenia
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Visible Trends, Submerged Dynamics: A Multi‐Layered Science Mapping of Corporate Sustainable Development Goals Reporting

Paola Musile Tanzi, Simone Terzani, Marco Avenia
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study conducts a bibliometric analysis and science mapping to trace the intellectual structure of corporate sustainability reporting concerning the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Reviewing 121 Web of Science articles published in 2015–2024, we overlay bibliographic coupling with co‐citation and co‐word analysis. Drawing on an integrative framework combining legitimacy, institutional and governance perspectives, we examine two propositions: that institutional contexts are reflected in thematic specialisation and that the field is moving from a rationale‐driven towards an implementation‐driven phase. The evidence is consistent with both. The analysis identifies five thematic clusters and three semantic domains, tracing a shift from adoption and legitimation towards disclosure quality, governance and measurement and shows that cluster membership is associated with the institutional setting of the underlying research. It also identifies under‐explored areas, including SMEs, sectoral heterogeneity, assurance and the near‐absence of research on market‐driven regimes. Bibliometric proximity indicates intellectual closeness rather than causal relationships.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
University of Perugia (IT), Bocconi University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.