Retrieval of Soybean SPAD at Different Vertical Canopy Scales Based on Fractional-Order Derivatives and Spectral Indices

Vertical heterogeneity in soybean canopies may lead to differences in the relationships between SPAD values at different canopy positions and canopy hyperspectral information, thereby affecting prediction performance. To characterize these spectral relationships and compare SPAD predictability, field experiments were conducted during the soybean flowering stage in Yangling, Shaanxi, China, in 2022 and 2023, with nine irrigation–nitrogen combinations and a rainfed control. A total of 120 paired observations of plant-level SPAD and canopy reflectance spectra were obtained from 20 fixed plots. Upper-layer SPAD, lower-layer SPAD, and their equal-weight arithmetic mean were used as estimation targets. Difference indices (DIs), soil-adjusted vegetation indices (SAVIs), and their combined feature set (ZU) were derived from fractional-order differentiated spectra and used with random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and backpropagation neural network (BPNN) models to compare prediction performance among the three targets. The optimal differentiation orders and wavelength combinations varied among SPAD targets. Upper-layer SPAD showed its strongest association at an order of 0.4 (maximum |r| = 0.737), whereas lower-layer and mean SPAD showed their strongest associations at an order of 1.2, with maximum |r| values of 0.733 and 0.810, respectively. Across the spectral input–algorithm combinations, mean SPAD generally achieved higher prediction accuracy. Its best out-of-fold R2 was 0.636, with an RMSE of 2.450 SPAD units, compared with maximum R2 values of 0.461 and 0.510 for upper- and lower-layer SPAD, respectively. Further evaluation showed that mean-SPAD models maintained relatively favorable performance under repeated grouped validation and bidirectional cross-year testing. The SAVI-RF model achieved a repeated-validation R2 of 0.597 ± 0.064 and cross-year R2 values of 0.655 and 0.611 in the two directions. These findings indicate that SPAD predictability from canopy hyperspectral data varies with the sampling target, with the equal-weight mean of upper- and lower-layer SPAD showing relatively higher and more stable predictive performance within the current experiment. The study highlights the importance of vertical canopy sampling in hyperspectral SPAD estimation and provides evidence to inform sampling design and hyperspectral monitoring of soybean at flowering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15192998
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Retrieval of Soybean SPAD at Different Vertical Canopy Scales Based on Fractional-Order Derivatives and Spectral Indices

Youzhen Xiang, Wangyang Li, Zijun Tang, Junsheng Lu et al.
Plants
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Retrieval of Soybean SPAD at Different Vertical Canopy Scales Based on Fractional-Order Derivatives and Spectral Indices

Youzhen Xiang, Wangyang Li, Zijun Tang, Junsheng Lu, Shiqi Liu, Jinqi Wu, Wenting Hou, Ruiqi Du, Shuai Li
article en

Abstract

Vertical heterogeneity in soybean canopies may lead to differences in the relationships between SPAD values at different canopy positions and canopy hyperspectral information, thereby affecting prediction performance. To characterize these spectral relationships and compare SPAD predictability, field experiments were conducted during the soybean flowering stage in Yangling, Shaanxi, China, in 2022 and 2023, with nine irrigation–nitrogen combinations and a rainfed control. A total of 120 paired observations of plant-level SPAD and canopy reflectance spectra were obtained from 20 fixed plots. Upper-layer SPAD, lower-layer SPAD, and their equal-weight arithmetic mean were used as estimation targets. Difference indices (DIs), soil-adjusted vegetation indices (SAVIs), and their combined feature set (ZU) were derived from fractional-order differentiated spectra and used with random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and backpropagation neural network (BPNN) models to compare prediction performance among the three targets. The optimal differentiation orders and wavelength combinations varied among SPAD targets. Upper-layer SPAD showed its strongest association at an order of 0.4 (maximum |r| = 0.737), whereas lower-layer and mean SPAD showed their strongest associations at an order of 1.2, with maximum |r| values of 0.733 and 0.810, respectively. Across the spectral input–algorithm combinations, mean SPAD generally achieved higher prediction accuracy. Its best out-of-fold R2 was 0.636, with an RMSE of 2.450 SPAD units, compared with maximum R2 values of 0.461 and 0.510 for upper- and lower-layer SPAD, respectively. Further evaluation showed that mean-SPAD models maintained relatively favorable performance under repeated grouped validation and bidirectional cross-year testing. The SAVI-RF model achieved a repeated-validation R2 of 0.597 ± 0.064 and cross-year R2 values of 0.655 and 0.611 in the two directions. These findings indicate that SPAD predictability from canopy hyperspectral data varies with the sampling target, with the equal-weight mean of upper- and lower-layer SPAD showing relatively higher and more stable predictive performance within the current experiment. The study highlights the importance of vertical canopy sampling in hyperspectral SPAD estimation and provides evidence to inform sampling design and hyperspectral monitoring of soybean at flowering.

PlantsVol. 15(19)
Xi'an University of Science and Technology (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.