Contextual factors affecting out-of-field teaching of mathematics in Australia

Abstract Out-of-field (OOF) mathematics teaching remains a persistent challenge internationally, driven by ongoing teacher shortages and difficulties staffing mathematics classrooms with appropriately qualified teachers. While previous research has focused on the prevalence, consequences, and lived experiences of OOF teaching, less attention has been given to the pathways through which teachers may develop towards in-field practice. This study examines stakeholder perspectives on three pathways identified in the literature as supporting the development of subject expertise: initial teacher education (ITE), workplace learning and support, and professional education (PE). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 stakeholders involved in mathematics teacher education, professional learning, policy, and professional associations. Data were analysed using a hybrid thematic approach that combined deductive coding according to the three pathways with inductive analysis of themes emerging within each pathway. Findings indicate that stakeholders viewed ITE, workplace learning, and PE as complementary rather than competing pathways, each offering distinct opportunities and challenges. Key contextual conditions influencing movement towards in-field practice included workforce shortages, limited recognition of mathematics re-specialisation, and the role of professional identity in shaping engagement with learning opportunities. While each pathway was viewed as valuable, none was considered sufficient in isolation. The study highlights the importance of pathway coherence, suggesting that supporting OOF mathematics teachers requires stronger connections between pathways and professional systems that recognise, support, and value the development of mathematics expertise throughout teachers’ careers. The findings contribute to international discussions concerning teacher workforce sustainability, mathematics teacher expertise, and pathways towards in-field practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ZDM
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-026-01847-8
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Contextual factors affecting out-of-field teaching of mathematics in Australia

Greg Oates, Osman Kasimu, Trevor McCandless, Janet Dutton et al.
ZDM
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Contextual factors affecting out-of-field teaching of mathematics in Australia

Greg Oates, Osman Kasimu, Trevor McCandless, Janet Dutton, Chris Speldewinde, Susan Caldis, Emily Ross, Hobbs Linda, Merrilyn Goos, Karen Shelley, Connie Cirkony, Seamus Delaney
article en

Abstract

Abstract Out-of-field (OOF) mathematics teaching remains a persistent challenge internationally, driven by ongoing teacher shortages and difficulties staffing mathematics classrooms with appropriately qualified teachers. While previous research has focused on the prevalence, consequences, and lived experiences of OOF teaching, less attention has been given to the pathways through which teachers may develop towards in-field practice. This study examines stakeholder perspectives on three pathways identified in the literature as supporting the development of subject expertise: initial teacher education (ITE), workplace learning and support, and professional education (PE). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 stakeholders involved in mathematics teacher education, professional learning, policy, and professional associations. Data were analysed using a hybrid thematic approach that combined deductive coding according to the three pathways with inductive analysis of themes emerging within each pathway. Findings indicate that stakeholders viewed ITE, workplace learning, and PE as complementary rather than competing pathways, each offering distinct opportunities and challenges. Key contextual conditions influencing movement towards in-field practice included workforce shortages, limited recognition of mathematics re-specialisation, and the role of professional identity in shaping engagement with learning opportunities. While each pathway was viewed as valuable, none was considered sufficient in isolation. The study highlights the importance of pathway coherence, suggesting that supporting OOF mathematics teachers requires stronger connections between pathways and professional systems that recognise, support, and value the development of mathematics expertise throughout teachers’ careers. The findings contribute to international discussions concerning teacher workforce sustainability, mathematics teacher expertise, and pathways towards in-field practice.

ZDM
University of Tasmania (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Monash University (AU), Southern Cross University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.