Evolution laws of wellbore annular multiphase flow under coexisting overflow and lost circulation conditions

Abstract Deep and ultra-deep well drilling frequently encounters narrow pressure window formations with multiple pressure systems, leading to the simultaneous occurrence of formation gas influx (overflow) and drilling fluid loss (lost circulation). Existing studies have largely focused on gravity-displacement-type coexistence within the same layer, while the flow characteristics of the scenario of upper overflow and lower lost circulation (Scenario 2) and the scenario of upper lost circulation and lower overflow (Scenario 1) remain poorly understood. In this study, a large-scale visualised experimental device for wellbore gas-liquid two-phase flow under coexisting overflow and lost circulation conditions was designed and constructed based on geometric and Reynolds number similarity criteria. The device has an annular equivalent diameter of 130.9 mm and a total length of 10 m; two distinct coexisting configurations are reproduced by independently adjusting the gas-injection point and the lost-circulation port. Three flow patterns—bubbly, cap-bubble, and churn flow—were identified in the large-diameter annulus. Under Scenario 1, the flow pattern remains essentially unchanged as the lost-circulation rate increases. Under Scenario 2, a clear bubbly-to-cap-bubble transition is triggered once the lost-circulation rate exceeds 5 m 3 /h. Mechanistic analysis reveals that these contrasting behaviours arise from a fundamental difference in loss mode: gas and liquid are discharged simultaneously at an unchanged gas-liquid ratio in Scenario 1, whereas only liquid is lost in Scenario 2, progressively increasing the in-situ gas-liquid ratio. Based on this mechanistic distinction, correction methods for apparent gas and liquid velocities were formulated for each configuration; after correction, the maximum pressure-gradient prediction error was reduced to below 10% and the average error to below 4%. The findings provide experimental evidence and theoretical support for well-control design under coexisting overflow and lost circulation conditions in deep and ultra-deep wells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-73282-4
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evolution laws of wellbore annular multiphase flow under coexisting overflow and lost circulation conditions

Yushan Zheng, Shuang Liang, Yinghua Jing, Xuefeng Li et al.
Scientific Reports
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Evolution laws of wellbore annular multiphase flow under coexisting overflow and lost circulation conditions

Yushan Zheng, Shuang Liang, Yinghua Jing, Xuefeng Li, Baojiang Sun
article en

Abstract

Abstract Deep and ultra-deep well drilling frequently encounters narrow pressure window formations with multiple pressure systems, leading to the simultaneous occurrence of formation gas influx (overflow) and drilling fluid loss (lost circulation). Existing studies have largely focused on gravity-displacement-type coexistence within the same layer, while the flow characteristics of the scenario of upper overflow and lower lost circulation (Scenario 2) and the scenario of upper lost circulation and lower overflow (Scenario 1) remain poorly understood. In this study, a large-scale visualised experimental device for wellbore gas-liquid two-phase flow under coexisting overflow and lost circulation conditions was designed and constructed based on geometric and Reynolds number similarity criteria. The device has an annular equivalent diameter of 130.9 mm and a total length of 10 m; two distinct coexisting configurations are reproduced by independently adjusting the gas-injection point and the lost-circulation port. Three flow patterns—bubbly, cap-bubble, and churn flow—were identified in the large-diameter annulus. Under Scenario 1, the flow pattern remains essentially unchanged as the lost-circulation rate increases. Under Scenario 2, a clear bubbly-to-cap-bubble transition is triggered once the lost-circulation rate exceeds 5 m 3 /h. Mechanistic analysis reveals that these contrasting behaviours arise from a fundamental difference in loss mode: gas and liquid are discharged simultaneously at an unchanged gas-liquid ratio in Scenario 1, whereas only liquid is lost in Scenario 2, progressively increasing the in-situ gas-liquid ratio. Based on this mechanistic distinction, correction methods for apparent gas and liquid velocities were formulated for each configuration; after correction, the maximum pressure-gradient prediction error was reduced to below 10% and the average error to below 4%. The findings provide experimental evidence and theoretical support for well-control design under coexisting overflow and lost circulation conditions in deep and ultra-deep wells.

Scientific Reports
China University of Petroleum, East China (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.