Guardians of dictatorship: Military personalization and the pursuit of biological weapons in authoritarian regimes

What explains the selective pursuit of biological weapons (BW) among authoritarian regimes? While many autocracies have pursued chemical weapons, few have developed BW programs. Drawing on regime security theory, this paper argues that military personalization raises the likelihood of BW pursuit through two mechanisms: it weakens conventional military effectiveness, creating incentives for asymmetric strategic hedges, and reduces internal veto points, enabling the coordination and secrecy that BW programs require. Personalization thus functions as a necessary rather than sufficient condition, while external insecurity acts as the trigger converting latent capacity into active pursuit. Empirical analyses of authoritarian regimes from 1950–2010 broadly support these claims, though the strength of evidence varies across model specifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942261491540
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Guardians of dictatorship: Military personalization and the pursuit of biological weapons in authoritarian regimes

Hooryang Lee
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Guardians of dictatorship: Military personalization and the pursuit of biological weapons in authoritarian regimes

Hooryang Lee
article en

Abstract

What explains the selective pursuit of biological weapons (BW) among authoritarian regimes? While many autocracies have pursued chemical weapons, few have developed BW programs. Drawing on regime security theory, this paper argues that military personalization raises the likelihood of BW pursuit through two mechanisms: it weakens conventional military effectiveness, creating incentives for asymmetric strategic hedges, and reduces internal veto points, enabling the coordination and secrecy that BW programs require. Personalization thus functions as a necessary rather than sufficient condition, while external insecurity acts as the trigger converting latent capacity into active pursuit. Empirical analyses of authoritarian regimes from 1950–2010 broadly support these claims, though the strength of evidence varies across model specifications.

Conflict Management and Peace Science
Korea Military Academy (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.