Can Clergy Be Religious Without Supernatural Belief? Rethinking Secularity Through Religious Naturalism

This article uses a qualitative case study of nonsupernaturalist clergy to examine a methodological and conceptual question in the study of secularity. Prevailing approaches often distinguish religious from secular populations based on affiliation, institutional participation, or self-identification, yet these indicators do not always reflect individuals’ ontological commitments. Drawing primarily on qualitative interviews with nonbelieving clergy, alongside evidence from other religious contexts, the study explores how ontological naturalism can coexist with religious leadership, participation, and institutional belonging across traditions with varying degrees of theological pluralism. Drawing on classical and contemporary theoretical frameworks, the analysis argues that such cases remain recognizably religious while illustrating processes of internal secularization within historically supernatural traditions. Rather than redefining religion or secularity, the article argues that greater attention to ontological commitments, alongside affiliation, practice, and identity, can improve the conceptual precision of research on secular populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Research on Religion
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032261493473
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Can Clergy Be Religious Without Supernatural Belief? Rethinking Secularity Through Religious Naturalism

Alexandr Zamușinski
Critical Research on Religion
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Can Clergy Be Religious Without Supernatural Belief? Rethinking Secularity Through Religious Naturalism

Alexandr Zamușinski
article en

Abstract

This article uses a qualitative case study of nonsupernaturalist clergy to examine a methodological and conceptual question in the study of secularity. Prevailing approaches often distinguish religious from secular populations based on affiliation, institutional participation, or self-identification, yet these indicators do not always reflect individuals’ ontological commitments. Drawing primarily on qualitative interviews with nonbelieving clergy, alongside evidence from other religious contexts, the study explores how ontological naturalism can coexist with religious leadership, participation, and institutional belonging across traditions with varying degrees of theological pluralism. Drawing on classical and contemporary theoretical frameworks, the analysis argues that such cases remain recognizably religious while illustrating processes of internal secularization within historically supernatural traditions. Rather than redefining religion or secularity, the article argues that greater attention to ontological commitments, alongside affiliation, practice, and identity, can improve the conceptual precision of research on secular populations.

Critical Research on Religion
Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Clergy Be Religious Without Supernatural Belief? Rethinking Secularity Through Religious Naturalism — Alexandr Zamușinski · Critical Research on Religion (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS