Decision-making around risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among BRCA1/2-positive breast cancer patients: an exploratory mixed-methods study

Decision-making for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA-positive women is complex and influenced by both personal and psychosocial factors. Understanding these factors is essential to optimize patient-centered care. To explore RRSO decision-making, and describe RRSO decision status, among BRCA1/2-positive breast cancer patients, using an exploratory mixed-methods design in which qualitative findings drive interpretation. An exploratory, convergent mixed-methods study was conducted in 12 BRCA1/2-positive breast cancer women. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, and in-depth interviews with the same participants explored facilitators and barriers to RRSO. Categorical variables were summarized descriptively as frequencies and percentages; given the small sample, no inferential statistical testing was performed. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and qualitative and quantitative findings were integrated to develop the study's interpretation. Of 12 women, 7 (58%) opted for RRSO and 5 (42%) declined. Among those classified as having accepted/planned/completed RRSO, 3 (43%) carried BRCA1 and 4 (57%) carried BRCA2 pathogenic variants. RRSO acceptance/planning appeared more common among women aged ≥ 50 years and among those with 1–2 children (71%); these are descriptive trends only, as the sample was too small to test for associations with parity, education, employment, menopausal status, or family history. Key facilitators included awareness of cancer risk, family support, clinician recommendation, availability of minimally invasive or combined procedures, and prior treatment experience. Major barriers included concerns about the effects of surgical menopause on fertility, emotional wellbeing, and social and womanhood-related roles. The qualitative findings were consistent with and provided context for the descriptive patterns observed. RRSO decision-making is multifactorial, shaped by clinical and psychosocial factors. Personalized counseling, psychosocial support, decision aids and family-centered discussions are crucial to support informed choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16919-x
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Decision-making around risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among BRCA1/2-positive breast cancer patients: an exploratory mixed-methods study

Rozilla Sadia Khan, Uzma Chishti, Sheikh Irfan, Fizza Akbar et al.
BMC Cancer
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Decision-making around risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among BRCA1/2-positive breast cancer patients: an exploratory mixed-methods study

Rozilla Sadia Khan, Uzma Chishti, Sheikh Irfan, Fizza Akbar, Aliya Begum Aziz, Nadia Pervaiz, Bakhtawar Shalwani
article en

Abstract

Decision-making for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA-positive women is complex and influenced by both personal and psychosocial factors. Understanding these factors is essential to optimize patient-centered care. To explore RRSO decision-making, and describe RRSO decision status, among BRCA1/2-positive breast cancer patients, using an exploratory mixed-methods design in which qualitative findings drive interpretation. An exploratory, convergent mixed-methods study was conducted in 12 BRCA1/2-positive breast cancer women. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, and in-depth interviews with the same participants explored facilitators and barriers to RRSO. Categorical variables were summarized descriptively as frequencies and percentages; given the small sample, no inferential statistical testing was performed. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and qualitative and quantitative findings were integrated to develop the study's interpretation. Of 12 women, 7 (58%) opted for RRSO and 5 (42%) declined. Among those classified as having accepted/planned/completed RRSO, 3 (43%) carried BRCA1 and 4 (57%) carried BRCA2 pathogenic variants. RRSO acceptance/planning appeared more common among women aged ≥ 50 years and among those with 1–2 children (71%); these are descriptive trends only, as the sample was too small to test for associations with parity, education, employment, menopausal status, or family history. Key facilitators included awareness of cancer risk, family support, clinician recommendation, availability of minimally invasive or combined procedures, and prior treatment experience. Major barriers included concerns about the effects of surgical menopause on fertility, emotional wellbeing, and social and womanhood-related roles. The qualitative findings were consistent with and provided context for the descriptive patterns observed. RRSO decision-making is multifactorial, shaped by clinical and psychosocial factors. Personalized counseling, psychosocial support, decision aids and family-centered discussions are crucial to support informed choices.

BMC Cancer
Aga Khan University Hospital (PK), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.