Listener Commentary Reveals the Social Salience of Accent Features

ABSTRACT This paper examines how listeners from two regions of England perceive and describe Northern English accents. Using the Salient Language in Context (SLIC) methodology, 94 respondents from two regions of England listened to recorded voices, clicking when they noticed features and providing open‐ended comments. The analysis shows that the type of listener comment was strongly conditioned by the speech sample and listener background. Listeners explained what they heard by naming or describing sounds, representing pronunciation in writing, reflecting on recognition, or linking voices to other accents, speakers, places, and varieties. The findings show that listener commentary is not merely supplementary to perception, but part of the process through which accents are interpreted and given social meaning. By tracing these processes in real time, the study contributes new evidence to debates on indexicality, salience, linguistic awareness, and enregisterment, offering a theoretical account of how social meanings of language are continually reproduced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sociolinguistics
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.70075
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Listener Commentary Reveals the Social Salience of Accent Features

Chris Montgomery
Journal of Sociolinguistics
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Listener Commentary Reveals the Social Salience of Accent Features

Chris Montgomery
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines how listeners from two regions of England perceive and describe Northern English accents. Using the Salient Language in Context (SLIC) methodology, 94 respondents from two regions of England listened to recorded voices, clicking when they noticed features and providing open‐ended comments. The analysis shows that the type of listener comment was strongly conditioned by the speech sample and listener background. Listeners explained what they heard by naming or describing sounds, representing pronunciation in writing, reflecting on recognition, or linking voices to other accents, speakers, places, and varieties. The findings show that listener commentary is not merely supplementary to perception, but part of the process through which accents are interpreted and given social meaning. By tracing these processes in real time, the study contributes new evidence to debates on indexicality, salience, linguistic awareness, and enregisterment, offering a theoretical account of how social meanings of language are continually reproduced.

Journal of Sociolinguistics
University of Sheffield (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.