Geopolitical Risk, Government Size and Environmental Sustainability Nexus for SDG 7 and SDG 13 Aligned Ecological Transition in BRICS ‐T Economies

ABSTRACT Growing geopolitical uncertainty and ecological degradation have become major barriers to environmental sustainability and sustainable development, particularly, in emerging economies facing rising energy insecurity and institutional challenges. Geopolitical tensions may undermine sustainability transitions by discouraging green investment, disrupting renewable energy systems and increasing reliance on carbon‐intensive energy sources. This study examines the impact of geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability and investigates whether government size moderates the environmental consequences of geopolitical instability in BRICS‐T economies over the period 1996–2023. Ecological footprint is employed as a comprehensive measure of environmental sustainability, while the Method of Moments Quantile Regression approach is used to capture heterogeneous effects across different ecological pressure regimes. The findings reveal that geopolitical risk increases ecological footprint, thereby weakening environmental sustainability. In contrast, government size reduces ecological pressure, indicating that stronger public sector involvement contributes positively to sustainability outcomes. The interaction analysis further demonstrates that government size mitigates the adverse environmental effects associated with geopolitical instability across the conditional distribution of ecological footprint. In addition, renewable energy consumption improves environmental sustainability, while economic growth and trade openness generally contribute to reducing ecological degradation. The study contributes to the sustainable development literature by demonstrating that government size plays a critical role in mitigating the adverse environmental consequences of geopolitical uncertainty through sustainability‐oriented public expenditure. The findings highlight the importance of renewable energy transition, environmental governance and resilient public institutions for supporting sustainable development and achieving SDG 7, SDG 13 and SDG 16 in emerging economies facing rising geopolitical instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71735
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Geopolitical Risk, Government Size and Environmental Sustainability Nexus for SDG 7 and SDG 13 Aligned Ecological Transition in BRICS ‐T Economies

Mohammad Subhan, Anam Ul Haq Ganie, Safia Omer Hapallah Omer
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Geopolitical Risk, Government Size and Environmental Sustainability Nexus for SDG 7 and SDG 13 Aligned Ecological Transition in BRICS ‐T Economies

Mohammad Subhan, Anam Ul Haq Ganie, Safia Omer Hapallah Omer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Growing geopolitical uncertainty and ecological degradation have become major barriers to environmental sustainability and sustainable development, particularly, in emerging economies facing rising energy insecurity and institutional challenges. Geopolitical tensions may undermine sustainability transitions by discouraging green investment, disrupting renewable energy systems and increasing reliance on carbon‐intensive energy sources. This study examines the impact of geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability and investigates whether government size moderates the environmental consequences of geopolitical instability in BRICS‐T economies over the period 1996–2023. Ecological footprint is employed as a comprehensive measure of environmental sustainability, while the Method of Moments Quantile Regression approach is used to capture heterogeneous effects across different ecological pressure regimes. The findings reveal that geopolitical risk increases ecological footprint, thereby weakening environmental sustainability. In contrast, government size reduces ecological pressure, indicating that stronger public sector involvement contributes positively to sustainability outcomes. The interaction analysis further demonstrates that government size mitigates the adverse environmental effects associated with geopolitical instability across the conditional distribution of ecological footprint. In addition, renewable energy consumption improves environmental sustainability, while economic growth and trade openness generally contribute to reducing ecological degradation. The study contributes to the sustainable development literature by demonstrating that government size plays a critical role in mitigating the adverse environmental consequences of geopolitical uncertainty through sustainability‐oriented public expenditure. The findings highlight the importance of renewable energy transition, environmental governance and resilient public institutions for supporting sustainable development and achieving SDG 7, SDG 13 and SDG 16 in emerging economies facing rising geopolitical instability.

Sustainable Development
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Bahçeşehir University (TR), Woxsen School of Business (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.