The limited effects of social media use on misperceptions Social media’s limited role in misperceptions

Social media use has the potential to promote misperceptions, but evidence is mixed. Despite social media characteristics that include homophilous social networks, algorithms that can reinforce biases, and social bots that promote falsehoods, there is no evidence of a strong association between social media use and misperceptions. This project offers the strongest empirical test of this relation to date, providing additional evidence of the minimal effects of social media use on misperceptions. Data come from two independent large- N panel studies, each paired with online tracking data, one focused on the 2020 election and the other on the COVID-19 pandemic. Within-between regression models show that social media use was not associated with a statistically significant decline in Americans’ ability to discriminate between true and false claims on any of the four platforms examined—Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354486
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The limited effects of social media use on misperceptions Social media’s limited role in misperceptions

Duane T. Wegener, R. Garrett, Kilhoe Na, Qin Li et al.
PLoS ONE
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

The limited effects of social media use on misperceptions Social media’s limited role in misperceptions

Duane T. Wegener, R. Garrett, Kilhoe Na, Qin Li, Robert M. Bond, Graham Dixon, Erik Nisbet, Shelly Hovick
article en

Abstract

Social media use has the potential to promote misperceptions, but evidence is mixed. Despite social media characteristics that include homophilous social networks, algorithms that can reinforce biases, and social bots that promote falsehoods, there is no evidence of a strong association between social media use and misperceptions. This project offers the strongest empirical test of this relation to date, providing additional evidence of the minimal effects of social media use on misperceptions. Data come from two independent large- N panel studies, each paired with online tracking data, one focused on the 2020 election and the other on the COVID-19 pandemic. Within-between regression models show that social media use was not associated with a statistically significant decline in Americans’ ability to discriminate between true and false claims on any of the four platforms examined—Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Northwestern University (US), Merrimack College (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.