Measurement report: Global Total Ozone Records – Part 1: Ground-based monitoring networks performance assessment and status review

Total column ozone (TCO) has been observed since the 1920s, with a systematic monitoring network established during the International Geophysical Year (1957–1958). We compile and assess TCO records from six major ground-based instrument types: Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers, Filter ozonometers, zenith-sky DOAS (UVVIS), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and Pandora spectrometers. Data are drawn from the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre, Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change, Pandonia Global Network, and European Brewer Network. Using harmonized statistical criteria and daily comparisons with multiple satellite products and four reanalysis datasets, we evaluate site-level performance in 5-year intervals from 1940 to 2024. Metrics include mean bias, variability of daily and monthly differences, seasonal amplitude, and the range of annual means, with percentile-based thresholds used to classify data quality. Ground-based annual means generally agree with satellite and reanalysis benchmarks within ± 2 %, with typical variability near 2 %. Larger discrepancies occur in the pre-satellite era, where reanalyses show biases of up to −5 % relative to Dobson observations. Network-wide distributions of daily mean differences to those from reanalysis and satellite data indicate comparable internal consistency for Brewer, Dobson, FTIR, and Pandora (standard deviations generally around 2 %), while Filter and UVVIS exhibit slightly broader spreads (< 3 %), especially at high latitudes. Network capacity has evolved substantially since the 2000s, with a decline in Dobson sites and expansion of Brewer and Pandora observations. By providing station-level flags and thresholds, this assessment helps network operators prioritize calibration and reprocessing efforts and helps users identify robust records, thereby improving confidence in long-term ozone trend detection and satellite validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13693-2026
Primary Topic
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Measurement report: Global Total Ozone Records – Part 1: Ground-based monitoring networks performance assessment and status review

Tom Kralidis, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, Irina V. Petropavlovskikh, Kimberly Strong et al.
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
article

Measurement report: Global Total Ozone Records – Part 1: Ground-based monitoring networks performance assessment and status review

Tom Kralidis, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, Irina V. Petropavlovskikh, Kimberly Strong, Debora Griffin, Vitali Fioletov, Voltaire A. Velazco, Ronald Johannes van der A, Masatomo Fujiwara, Martin Tiefengraber, Xiaoyi Zhao, Sum Chi Lee, Alberto Redondas, Chris Anthony McLinden, Thomas Frost Hanisco, Andrea Pazmiño, Gordon Labow, Alexander Cede, Michel Van Roozendael, Anna Solomatnikova, Corinne Vigouroux
article en

Abstract

Total column ozone (TCO) has been observed since the 1920s, with a systematic monitoring network established during the International Geophysical Year (1957–1958). We compile and assess TCO records from six major ground-based instrument types: Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers, Filter ozonometers, zenith-sky DOAS (UVVIS), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and Pandora spectrometers. Data are drawn from the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre, Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change, Pandonia Global Network, and European Brewer Network. Using harmonized statistical criteria and daily comparisons with multiple satellite products and four reanalysis datasets, we evaluate site-level performance in 5-year intervals from 1940 to 2024. Metrics include mean bias, variability of daily and monthly differences, seasonal amplitude, and the range of annual means, with percentile-based thresholds used to classify data quality. Ground-based annual means generally agree with satellite and reanalysis benchmarks within ± 2 %, with typical variability near 2 %. Larger discrepancies occur in the pre-satellite era, where reanalyses show biases of up to −5 % relative to Dobson observations. Network-wide distributions of daily mean differences to those from reanalysis and satellite data indicate comparable internal consistency for Brewer, Dobson, FTIR, and Pandora (standard deviations generally around 2 %), while Filter and UVVIS exhibit slightly broader spreads (< 3 %), especially at high latitudes. Network capacity has evolved substantially since the 2000s, with a decline in Dobson sites and expansion of Brewer and Pandora observations. By providing station-level flags and thresholds, this assessment helps network operators prioritize calibration and reprocessing efforts and helps users identify robust records, thereby improving confidence in long-term ozone trend detection and satellite validation.

Atmospheric chemistry and physicsVol. 26(19)
Agencia Estatal de Meteorología (ES), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL), Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), Deutscher Wetterdienst (DE), University of Toronto (CA), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BE), Hokkaido University (JP), Voeikov Main Geophysical Observatory (RU), NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.