Where climate governance meets trafficking risk: Structural drivers of labour market pressure across a global panel, 2000–2023

This study asks one question. Which structural conditions determine where governance-activated transition episodes, meaning country-years in which climate adaptive capacity is improving while labour market pressure on trafficking-affected populations remains elevated, concentrate across the global income distribution? Using data on 192 countries from 2000 to 2023, we build the Job and Trafficking Pressure Index (JTPI) to detect these episodes and test what structural conditions predict where they concentrate, using several statistical approaches that check the pattern from different angles. Countries with rising climate governance capacity are consistently more likely to show these transition episodes than countries without it, a result that holds across every method we use and confirms that JTPI is capturing a real and meaningful pattern rather than statistical noise. This pattern is strongest and most reliable in Upper-Middle Income economies, while the poorest countries lack sufficient data on climate readiness and labour markets to support firm conclusions. When we ask which countries experience this pattern most intensely, three features stand out. Larger populations, greater openness to trade, and higher rates of urbanisation are the strongest predictors, pointing to a specific mechanism. Climate investment tends to create new formal jobs in cities and trade sectors, and it is in these growing urban and trade-dependent economies that trafficking-affected workers appear to be drawn into the formal labour market in the largest numbers. They answer the question posed at the outset. Governance-activated transition episodes concentrate in populous, trade-open, urbanising economies rather than uniformly across the income distribution. This gives national adaptation plans, climate finance conditionality frameworks, and anti-trafficking governance bodies a specific structural target rather than a general policy aspiration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.131049
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Where climate governance meets trafficking risk: Structural drivers of labour market pressure across a global panel, 2000–2023

Jesús Arteaga-Ortíz, Gonzalo Hernández Soto, Manuel A. Zambrano‐Monserrate
Journal of Environmental Management
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Where climate governance meets trafficking risk: Structural drivers of labour market pressure across a global panel, 2000–2023

Jesús Arteaga-Ortíz, Gonzalo Hernández Soto, Manuel A. Zambrano‐Monserrate
article en

Abstract

This study asks one question. Which structural conditions determine where governance-activated transition episodes, meaning country-years in which climate adaptive capacity is improving while labour market pressure on trafficking-affected populations remains elevated, concentrate across the global income distribution? Using data on 192 countries from 2000 to 2023, we build the Job and Trafficking Pressure Index (JTPI) to detect these episodes and test what structural conditions predict where they concentrate, using several statistical approaches that check the pattern from different angles. Countries with rising climate governance capacity are consistently more likely to show these transition episodes than countries without it, a result that holds across every method we use and confirms that JTPI is capturing a real and meaningful pattern rather than statistical noise. This pattern is strongest and most reliable in Upper-Middle Income economies, while the poorest countries lack sufficient data on climate readiness and labour markets to support firm conclusions. When we ask which countries experience this pattern most intensely, three features stand out. Larger populations, greater openness to trade, and higher rates of urbanisation are the strongest predictors, pointing to a specific mechanism. Climate investment tends to create new formal jobs in cities and trade sectors, and it is in these growing urban and trade-dependent economies that trafficking-affected workers appear to be drawn into the formal labour market in the largest numbers. They answer the question posed at the outset. Governance-activated transition episodes concentrate in populous, trade-open, urbanising economies rather than uniformly across the income distribution. This gives national adaptation plans, climate finance conditionality frameworks, and anti-trafficking governance bodies a specific structural target rather than a general policy aspiration.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 418
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Where climate governance meets trafficking risk: Structural drivers of labour market pressure across a global panel, 2000–2023 — Jesús Arteaga-Ortíz, Gonzalo Hernández Soto, et al. · Journal of Environmental Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS