Two‐year follow‐up of postcommercialisation cohort of 100 bridge‐enhanced anterior cruciate ligament restorations shows low retear rate and good patient‐reported outcomes

Abstract Purpose To review adverse events and outcomes 2 years postoperatively from the Bridge Enhanced anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) Restoration (BEAR) procedure in the first 100 subjects of the Bridge registry, a postcommercialisation prospective cohort. Methods Technique modifications (repair and bridging suture type, femoral and tibial fixation), adverse events and reoperations were recorded. Physical examinations were reported at 0, 6, 9 and 12 months and patient‐reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, Marx, return to sport index) were reported at 0, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months. Adverse events were compared between the original and modified technique groups using Fisher's Exact test. Paired t ‐tests were used to compare patient‐reported outcomes at 1 and 2 years. Results Mean follow‐up was 22.3 ± 5.5 months, range 3–32.7 months, with five subjects exiting early. Mean age was 31.8 ± 14.3 years (range 7.7–69.6). Sixty‐seven per cent were female. Fifty‐five underwent a BEAR procedure using the original technique, while 45 had a modified surgical technique. The overall rates of adverse events with reoperations at 2 years included: two ACL retears with meniscus injury, two ACL retears without meniscus injury, two contralateral tears, five meniscus injuries without ACL retear (one medial, three lateral, one both medial and lateral), two manipulations under anaesthesia, one lysis of adhesions/cyclops removal and four removals of retained suture. Overall reoperation rate was 18.9% (17/90) at 2 years (28.0% with original technique, 7.5% with modified technique; p = 0.02) with 5.6% (5/90) ipsilateral ACL retear rate. There were no significant differences in ACL retear rates between the original technique and modified technique groups. From 1 to 2 years, there were statistically significant improvements in IKDC and three of the five KOOS scales. Conclusion The rates of ACL retear status post BEAR with and without modification are low at 2 years, with five retears occurring between 14 and 28 months. Excellent stability and range of motion are attained at 1 year, with good patient reported outcomes measures at 2 years. Level of Evidence Level II, cohort study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70606
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Two‐year follow‐up of postcommercialisation cohort of 100 bridge‐enhanced anterior cruciate ligament restorations shows low retear rate and good patient‐reported outcomes

Dennis E. Kramer, Jocelyn R. Wittstein, Alexander K. Meininger, Andreas H. Gomoll et al.
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Two‐year follow‐up of postcommercialisation cohort of 100 bridge‐enhanced anterior cruciate ligament restorations shows low retear rate and good patient‐reported outcomes

Dennis E. Kramer, Jocelyn R. Wittstein, Alexander K. Meininger, Andreas H. Gomoll, Sean Keyes, Dean C. Taylor, Brian C. Lau, Jacqueline Munch Brady, Sean McMillan, Seth Lawrence Sherman, Sabrina M. Strickland, Marc Pietropaoli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To review adverse events and outcomes 2 years postoperatively from the Bridge Enhanced anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) Restoration (BEAR) procedure in the first 100 subjects of the Bridge registry, a postcommercialisation prospective cohort. Methods Technique modifications (repair and bridging suture type, femoral and tibial fixation), adverse events and reoperations were recorded. Physical examinations were reported at 0, 6, 9 and 12 months and patient‐reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, Marx, return to sport index) were reported at 0, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months. Adverse events were compared between the original and modified technique groups using Fisher's Exact test. Paired t ‐tests were used to compare patient‐reported outcomes at 1 and 2 years. Results Mean follow‐up was 22.3 ± 5.5 months, range 3–32.7 months, with five subjects exiting early. Mean age was 31.8 ± 14.3 years (range 7.7–69.6). Sixty‐seven per cent were female. Fifty‐five underwent a BEAR procedure using the original technique, while 45 had a modified surgical technique. The overall rates of adverse events with reoperations at 2 years included: two ACL retears with meniscus injury, two ACL retears without meniscus injury, two contralateral tears, five meniscus injuries without ACL retear (one medial, three lateral, one both medial and lateral), two manipulations under anaesthesia, one lysis of adhesions/cyclops removal and four removals of retained suture. Overall reoperation rate was 18.9% (17/90) at 2 years (28.0% with original technique, 7.5% with modified technique; p = 0.02) with 5.6% (5/90) ipsilateral ACL retear rate. There were no significant differences in ACL retear rates between the original technique and modified technique groups. From 1 to 2 years, there were statistically significant improvements in IKDC and three of the five KOOS scales. Conclusion The rates of ACL retear status post BEAR with and without modification are low at 2 years, with five retears occurring between 14 and 28 months. Excellent stability and range of motion are attained at 1 year, with good patient reported outcomes measures at 2 years. Level of Evidence Level II, cohort study.

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Harvard University (US), Duke University (US), AdventHealth Orlando (US), AdventHealth East Orlando (US), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Virtua Health (US), The Orthopaedic Institute (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.