Karl Philipp Moritz’s Notion of ‘Ideal Purposiveness’ and Kant’s Critique of ‘Objective Inner Purposiveness’

Abstract In this paper, I evaluate the claim that Karl Philipp Moritz’s conception of inner, or ‘ideal’, purposiveness anticipates Kant’s notion of subjective purposiveness. I analyse Moritz’s considered position of artistic beauty qua ideal and internal purposiveness, drawing from his mature publications on aesthetics. I demonstrate that while Kant’s notion of subjective purposiveness is meaningfully different from Moritz’s ideal/inner purposiveness, and that Kant ultimately rejects Moritz’s conception, he also takes Moritz’s conception of purposiveness to meaningfully approach the correct account of beauty, showing why this is.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kantian Review
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415426101538
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Karl Philipp Moritz’s Notion of ‘Ideal Purposiveness’ and Kant’s Critique of ‘Objective Inner Purposiveness’

Ekin Erkan
Kantian Review
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Karl Philipp Moritz’s Notion of ‘Ideal Purposiveness’ and Kant’s Critique of ‘Objective Inner Purposiveness’

Ekin Erkan
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, I evaluate the claim that Karl Philipp Moritz’s conception of inner, or ‘ideal’, purposiveness anticipates Kant’s notion of subjective purposiveness. I analyse Moritz’s considered position of artistic beauty qua ideal and internal purposiveness, drawing from his mature publications on aesthetics. I demonstrate that while Kant’s notion of subjective purposiveness is meaningfully different from Moritz’s ideal/inner purposiveness, and that Kant ultimately rejects Moritz’s conception, he also takes Moritz’s conception of purposiveness to meaningfully approach the correct account of beauty, showing why this is.

Kantian Review
University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.