Frame Running participation in all settings for people with physical disabilities—a systematic scoping review

Purpose This systematic scoping review aimed to map existing knowledge concerning Frame Running across settings for people with physical disabilities.Methods A three-step search strategy was applied across five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, and Scopus) through August 2025.Results Twenty studies (2010-2025) were included; quantitative (n = 16), qualitative (n = 1), and mixed-methods (n = 3). Most originated from Sweden (n = 6) and the United Kingdom (n = 6). The majority examined health impacts and physiological responses (n = 12), followed by performance enhancement and classification (n = 7), and participant experiences and perspectives (n = 1). Half of the studies included only participants with cerebral palsy (n = 10). Study designs were predominantly cross-sectional (n = 12), with a smaller number of pre-post study designs (n = 3), two of which assessed feasibility. In total, the studies included 494 Frame Running participants.Conclusions Frame Running is an emerging research field with suggested physiological and psychosocial benefits. Evidence is largely quantitative and cross-sectional, highlighting the need for prospective studies with low risk of bias to clarify its impacts and effectiveness of Frame Running, alongside research on lived experiences. Research should evaluate the classification structure and address accessibility across settings to support equitable access and further development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2734783
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Frame Running participation in all settings for people with physical disabilities—a systematic scoping review

Palle Larsen, Jan E. Lexell, Anders Holsgaard‐Larsen, Thomas Skovgaard et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
article

Frame Running participation in all settings for people with physical disabilities—a systematic scoping review

Palle Larsen, Jan E. Lexell, Anders Holsgaard‐Larsen, Thomas Skovgaard, Camilla Marie Larsen, Andreas Jørgensen, Lars Breum Christiansen, Tina Udemark Pasgaard, Vibeke Grandt, Josephine Kvejborg Rasmussen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This systematic scoping review aimed to map existing knowledge concerning Frame Running across settings for people with physical disabilities.Methods A three-step search strategy was applied across five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, and Scopus) through August 2025.Results Twenty studies (2010-2025) were included; quantitative (n = 16), qualitative (n = 1), and mixed-methods (n = 3). Most originated from Sweden (n = 6) and the United Kingdom (n = 6). The majority examined health impacts and physiological responses (n = 12), followed by performance enhancement and classification (n = 7), and participant experiences and perspectives (n = 1). Half of the studies included only participants with cerebral palsy (n = 10). Study designs were predominantly cross-sectional (n = 12), with a smaller number of pre-post study designs (n = 3), two of which assessed feasibility. In total, the studies included 494 Frame Running participants.Conclusions Frame Running is an emerging research field with suggested physiological and psychosocial benefits. Evidence is largely quantitative and cross-sectional, highlighting the need for prospective studies with low risk of bias to clarify its impacts and effectiveness of Frame Running, alongside research on lived experiences. Research should evaluate the classification structure and address accessibility across settings to support equitable access and further development.

Disability and Rehabilitation
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Lund University (SE), Odense University Hospital (DK), University College London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.