READ: Reasoning Like a Cardiologist for Contactless Arrhythmia Diagnosis

Arrhythmia poses a severe health risk, necessitating long-term monitoring to prevent complications like stroke. However, existing radar monitoring solutions fail to detect concurrent arrhythmias and lack clinical interpretability. In this paper, we bridge the gap by proposing READ (Radar Evidence-based Arrhythmia Diagnosis). Unlike previous “black-box” approaches, READ integrates mmWave radar with Large Language Models (LLMs) to deliver transparent, evidence-based diagnoses. However, training such a reasoning-capable model is hindered by the scarcity of mmWave datasets with detailed diagnostic annotations. To tackle this challenge, we first pretrain on large-scale ECG data to learn robust physiological patterns and then transfer this knowledge to radar domain using our proposed Cross-Physics Knowledge Distillation (CPKD) framework. Furthermore, we design a Morphological Grouping Tokenizer and a Morphology-Anchored Clinical Reasoning module, which parse raw signals into semantic tokens to guide step-by-step diagnostic inference. Empirical evaluation on a real-world dataset of 205 patients, collected in collaboration with medical institutions, demonstrates READ 's superior performance, achieving a 90.12% exact match ratio and a 0.9625 F 1 score. Our framework significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines while providing interpretable clinical reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3831993
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

READ: Reasoning Like a Cardiologist for Contactless Arrhythmia Diagnosis

Jingjia Wang, Anfu Zhou, Mingqi Zheng, Rui Lyu et al.
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

READ: Reasoning Like a Cardiologist for Contactless Arrhythmia Diagnosis

Jingjia Wang, Anfu Zhou, Mingqi Zheng, Rui Lyu, Huadóng Ma, Xiangbin Meng, Chunli Shao, Juntao Duan, Hao Feng
article en

Abstract

Arrhythmia poses a severe health risk, necessitating long-term monitoring to prevent complications like stroke. However, existing radar monitoring solutions fail to detect concurrent arrhythmias and lack clinical interpretability. In this paper, we bridge the gap by proposing READ (Radar Evidence-based Arrhythmia Diagnosis). Unlike previous “black-box” approaches, READ integrates mmWave radar with Large Language Models (LLMs) to deliver transparent, evidence-based diagnoses. However, training such a reasoning-capable model is hindered by the scarcity of mmWave datasets with detailed diagnostic annotations. To tackle this challenge, we first pretrain on large-scale ECG data to learn robust physiological patterns and then transfer this knowledge to radar domain using our proposed Cross-Physics Knowledge Distillation (CPKD) framework. Furthermore, we design a Morphological Grouping Tokenizer and a Morphology-Anchored Clinical Reasoning module, which parse raw signals into semantic tokens to guide step-by-step diagnostic inference. Empirical evaluation on a real-world dataset of 205 patients, collected in collaboration with medical institutions, demonstrates READ 's superior performance, achieving a 90.12% exact match ratio and a 0.9625 F 1 score. Our framework significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines while providing interpretable clinical reports.

Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous TechnologiesVol. 10(3)
Hebei Medical University (CN), Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.