Who Decides? Rethinking Power and Practice in Research Ethics in and Beyond Myanmar

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Viewpoint
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.70066
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Who Decides? Rethinking Power and Practice in Research Ethics in and Beyond Myanmar

Anne Décobert, Zali Fung, Phyo Pyae Thida Htwe, Vanessa Lamb
Asia Pacific Viewpoint
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Who Decides? Rethinking Power and Practice in Research Ethics in and Beyond Myanmar

Anne Décobert, Zali Fung, Phyo Pyae Thida Htwe, Vanessa Lamb
article en

Abstract

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Asia Pacific Viewpoint
The University of Melbourne (AU), York University (CA), University of Lausanne (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.