Artificial Intelligence in Policing and Perceived Legitimacy: Does Gender Representation Make a Difference?

ABSTRACT As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly transforms public administration, understanding its impact on perceived legitimacy becomes paramount, particularly, in high‐stakes areas such as policing. While existing research offers mixed evidence on whether government AI use enhances or undermines citizens' perceptions of fairness and trust, the conditions moderating these effects remain underexplored. Drawing on representative bureaucracy theory, this study uses a survey experiment to investigate how gender representation moderates the effect of AI use on citizens' perceived fairness and trust in domestic violence units (DVUs). Results show that female representation positively moderates the legitimacy impact of a DVU's AI use; whereas AI use decreases female respondents' perceived fairness and trust in male‐dominated DVUs, these negative effects disappear in female‐dominated DVUs. Our findings identify representation as a key context shaping citizens' responses to government AI use, extending representative bureaucracy theory by demonstrating its indirect symbolic effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70214
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Artificial Intelligence in Policing and Perceived Legitimacy: Does Gender Representation Make a Difference?

Canyu Gao, Norma M. Riccucci
Public Administration Review
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence in Policing and Perceived Legitimacy: Does Gender Representation Make a Difference?

Canyu Gao, Norma M. Riccucci
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly transforms public administration, understanding its impact on perceived legitimacy becomes paramount, particularly, in high‐stakes areas such as policing. While existing research offers mixed evidence on whether government AI use enhances or undermines citizens' perceptions of fairness and trust, the conditions moderating these effects remain underexplored. Drawing on representative bureaucracy theory, this study uses a survey experiment to investigate how gender representation moderates the effect of AI use on citizens' perceived fairness and trust in domestic violence units (DVUs). Results show that female representation positively moderates the legitimacy impact of a DVU's AI use; whereas AI use decreases female respondents' perceived fairness and trust in male‐dominated DVUs, these negative effects disappear in female‐dominated DVUs. Our findings identify representation as a key context shaping citizens' responses to government AI use, extending representative bureaucracy theory by demonstrating its indirect symbolic effects.

Public Administration Review
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University Hospital, Newark (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence in Policing and Perceived Legitimacy: Does Gender Representation Make a Difference? — Canyu Gao, Norma M. Riccucci · Public Administration Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS