A comparative assessment of electrical reliability in screen-printed nonwoven substrates: Evolon versus Tyvek

Abstract The structural integrity and electrical reliability of wearable electronics heavily depend on the physical properties of the underlying substrate. While previous research established a theoretical framework for modeling electrical degradation in specific printed nonwovens, this study expands that scope by providing a comprehensive comparative analysis of two distinct substrates: Evolon and Tyvek. Three silver-based conductive inks with different rheological characteristics (according to manufacturers’ data) were screen-printed onto both materials to evaluate their performance under the mechanical stress of repeated washing cycles. We applied a longitudinal damage model to quantify the progressive degradation of the transmission lines. The experimental findings reveal a significant contrast in failure mechanisms dictated by the substrate’s architecture. Although Tyvek exhibited lower initial Direct Current (DC) resistance, the printed circuits on this substrate suffered catastrophic electrical failure during the washing tests. Conversely, the porous, hydro-entangled structure of Evolon facilitated better ink integration, resulting in a measurable, progressive damage evolution that depended on the ink formulation. This comparative assessment underscores the critical role of substrate-ink compatibility in maintaining electrical stability and provides a predictive approach for designing durable, washable e-textiles.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Science Composites
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42252-026-00109-w
Primary Topic
Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A comparative assessment of electrical reliability in screen-printed nonwoven substrates: Evolon versus Tyvek

Rachid Cherouaki, hasnaa boudarbala, Abdelwahad Maarouf, Mohamed Eddahby
Journal of Materials Science Composites
Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
article

A comparative assessment of electrical reliability in screen-printed nonwoven substrates: Evolon versus Tyvek

Rachid Cherouaki, hasnaa boudarbala, Abdelwahad Maarouf, Mohamed Eddahby
article en

Abstract

Abstract The structural integrity and electrical reliability of wearable electronics heavily depend on the physical properties of the underlying substrate. While previous research established a theoretical framework for modeling electrical degradation in specific printed nonwovens, this study expands that scope by providing a comprehensive comparative analysis of two distinct substrates: Evolon and Tyvek. Three silver-based conductive inks with different rheological characteristics (according to manufacturers’ data) were screen-printed onto both materials to evaluate their performance under the mechanical stress of repeated washing cycles. We applied a longitudinal damage model to quantify the progressive degradation of the transmission lines. The experimental findings reveal a significant contrast in failure mechanisms dictated by the substrate’s architecture. Although Tyvek exhibited lower initial Direct Current (DC) resistance, the printed circuits on this substrate suffered catastrophic electrical failure during the washing tests. Conversely, the porous, hydro-entangled structure of Evolon facilitated better ink integration, resulting in a measurable, progressive damage evolution that depended on the ink formulation. This comparative assessment underscores the critical role of substrate-ink compatibility in maintaining electrical stability and provides a predictive approach for designing durable, washable e-textiles.

Journal of Materials Science CompositesVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.