Phantom Networks: Window on Agency in Social Mechanisms

Our goal is to offer proof of concept for the idea that behavioral networks emerging with and beyond assigned treatment networks in experiments can provide a valuable window on agency. We call these often unobserved behavioral structures phantom networks. Most evidence of agency is entangled with audience — what people recall, how others attribute, or who is seen to act. We strip that away to observe agency directly in the ties participants build within and beyond what they are assigned. Their deviation from assignment is not error but structure-in-action, a behavioral trace of agency. We offer three exhibits of that “behavioral deviation” revealing agency in gendered brokerage, rival brokerage, and structural reproduction. Across the three exhibits, behavioral deviation shows how a team works (sometimes in surprising ways), not how well the team works. Teams perform as expected in theory, but the behavior responsible for their performance is made more apparent by watching behavioral deviation. We close with a summary proof of concept and discussion of next steps for particularly promising future work

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization Science
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2024.19305
Primary Topic
Social Power and Status Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Phantom Networks: Window on Agency in Social Mechanisms

Ray E. Reagans, Sonja Opper, Ronald S. Burt
Organization Science
Social Power and Status Dynamics
article

Phantom Networks: Window on Agency in Social Mechanisms

Ray E. Reagans, Sonja Opper, Ronald S. Burt
article en

Abstract

Our goal is to offer proof of concept for the idea that behavioral networks emerging with and beyond assigned treatment networks in experiments can provide a valuable window on agency. We call these often unobserved behavioral structures phantom networks. Most evidence of agency is entangled with audience — what people recall, how others attribute, or who is seen to act. We strip that away to observe agency directly in the ties participants build within and beyond what they are assigned. Their deviation from assignment is not error but structure-in-action, a behavioral trace of agency. We offer three exhibits of that “behavioral deviation” revealing agency in gendered brokerage, rival brokerage, and structural reproduction. Across the three exhibits, behavioral deviation shows how a team works (sometimes in surprising ways), not how well the team works. Teams perform as expected in theory, but the behavior responsible for their performance is made more apparent by watching behavioral deviation. We close with a summary proof of concept and discussion of next steps for particularly promising future work

Organization Science
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Bocconi University (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Power and Status Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Phantom Networks: Window on Agency in Social Mechanisms — Ray E. Reagans, Sonja Opper, et al. · Organization Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS