‘Smart court’ and digital judicialism in China

How has digital technology been applied to the operation of courts and dispute resolution in authoritarian regimes? Drawing on ethnographic research on the construction of the ‘smart court’ in China, this article explores the impact of digital technology on the judicial system and dispute resolution through the prototypical cases of the ‘shared court’ and the ‘One Network of Courts Nationwide’, which operate, respectively, outside and inside the courts. The article reveals that, unlike in democratic countries, where digital technology is used in a relatively more conservative and limited way, digital technology has been used by the Chinese Communist Party to strengthen state control, monitor society, and maintain political stability, thus giving rise to digital judicialism. The study of digital judicialism shows that while digital technology has certainly improved the efficiency of social dispute resolution to some extent, it has been reduced to a toolkit for the government to recentralize political power and guard against political risks. The findings compel researchers to reassess the role of digital technology in facilitating the resolution of disputes because it can undermine judicial independence and the development of the rule of law under authoritarianism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Information
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203x261490917
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

‘Smart court’ and digital judicialism in China

Jieren Hu, Haiyan Liu, Wei Hou
China Information
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

‘Smart court’ and digital judicialism in China

Jieren Hu, Haiyan Liu, Wei Hou
article en

Abstract

How has digital technology been applied to the operation of courts and dispute resolution in authoritarian regimes? Drawing on ethnographic research on the construction of the ‘smart court’ in China, this article explores the impact of digital technology on the judicial system and dispute resolution through the prototypical cases of the ‘shared court’ and the ‘One Network of Courts Nationwide’, which operate, respectively, outside and inside the courts. The article reveals that, unlike in democratic countries, where digital technology is used in a relatively more conservative and limited way, digital technology has been used by the Chinese Communist Party to strengthen state control, monitor society, and maintain political stability, thus giving rise to digital judicialism. The study of digital judicialism shows that while digital technology has certainly improved the efficiency of social dispute resolution to some extent, it has been reduced to a toolkit for the government to recentralize political power and guard against political risks. The findings compel researchers to reassess the role of digital technology in facilitating the resolution of disputes because it can undermine judicial independence and the development of the rule of law under authoritarianism.

China Information
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Hangzhou City University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Smart court’ and digital judicialism in China — Jieren Hu, Haiyan Liu, et al. · China Information (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS