Variables associated with variations in compulsory community treatment by health districts: A meta-regression analysis across four Australian jurisdictions

OBJECTIVE: The use of compulsory community treatment in Australia varies widely within, and across, jurisdictions for reasons that are not fully understood. This study, therefore, used meta-regression to explore possible explanations for this variation in the following four Australian states: Queensland, South Australia, New South Wales and Victoria. METHODS: Aggregated administrative data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare for 2018 were analysed, encompassing 402,060 individuals in contact with community mental health services. Meta-regression using logit-transformed proportions was employed to assess associations between compulsory community treatment rates and district-level sociodemographic variables, including age, sex, marital status, region of birth and metropolitan residence. Workforce data were also examined in New South Wales. RESULTS: Compulsory community treatment use varied significantly by jurisdiction and by health district within jurisdictions. Higher rates were associated with districts having more individuals aged 25-44 years, males (in South Australia), metropolitan residents, and those born outside Oceania. These associations persisted after adjustment. There was no statistically significant association between workforce levels and compulsory community treatment use in New South Wales. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that sociodemographic factors such as age, sex and place of residence or birth may explain some of the variation in compulsory community treatment use between health districts. The influence of sociodemographic variables and geographical location in influencing compulsory community treatment use at the health district level needs further investigation. REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au/; ACTRN12624000153516).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674261489461
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Variables associated with variations in compulsory community treatment by health districts: A meta-regression analysis across four Australian jurisdictions

Edwina M. Light, Vrinda Edan, Tessa‐May Zirnsak, Steve R Kisely et al.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Variables associated with variations in compulsory community treatment by health districts: A meta-regression analysis across four Australian jurisdictions

Edwina M. Light, Vrinda Edan, Tessa‐May Zirnsak, Steve R Kisely, Claudia F. Bull, Puneet Sansanwal, Lisa Brophy, Sharon Lawn, Penelope Weller, Christopher James Ryan, Chris Maylea
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of compulsory community treatment in Australia varies widely within, and across, jurisdictions for reasons that are not fully understood. This study, therefore, used meta-regression to explore possible explanations for this variation in the following four Australian states: Queensland, South Australia, New South Wales and Victoria. METHODS: Aggregated administrative data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare for 2018 were analysed, encompassing 402,060 individuals in contact with community mental health services. Meta-regression using logit-transformed proportions was employed to assess associations between compulsory community treatment rates and district-level sociodemographic variables, including age, sex, marital status, region of birth and metropolitan residence. Workforce data were also examined in New South Wales. RESULTS: Compulsory community treatment use varied significantly by jurisdiction and by health district within jurisdictions. Higher rates were associated with districts having more individuals aged 25-44 years, males (in South Australia), metropolitan residents, and those born outside Oceania. These associations persisted after adjustment. There was no statistically significant association between workforce levels and compulsory community treatment use in New South Wales. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that sociodemographic factors such as age, sex and place of residence or birth may explain some of the variation in compulsory community treatment use between health districts. The influence of sociodemographic variables and geographical location in influencing compulsory community treatment use at the health district level needs further investigation. REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au/; ACTRN12624000153516).

Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Griffith University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Dalhousie University (CA), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), La Trobe University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), Metro South Health (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), RMIT University (AU), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.