Constructing the Indo-Pacific: Discursive Power, Functional Cooperation and Competing Regional Imaginaries

This article investigates how the Indo-Pacific has been constructed as a geopolitical region through the discursive and functional practices of China, Japan and the USA. Drawing on constructivism and functionalism, the study analyses government documents, strategic speeches and aid initiatives to uncover divergent regional imaginaries. While Japan and the USA converge on a liberal Indo-Pacific vision, they diverge in tools of implementation, contrasting with China’s sovereignty-driven alternatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative, Global Development Initiative and Digital Silk Road. Functional domains such as infrastructure, digital connectivity and climate cooperation show overlapping scopes but conflicting normative logics. The article also examines how other regional actors such as Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), India, Australia and Pacific Island states accept, reinterpret or contest these visions. Finally, it argues that the Indo- Pacific is not a static construct but a contested space of layered geopolitical imaginations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970261490317
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Constructing the Indo-Pacific: Discursive Power, Functional Cooperation and Competing Regional Imaginaries

Manish Jung Pulami
Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
article

Constructing the Indo-Pacific: Discursive Power, Functional Cooperation and Competing Regional Imaginaries

Manish Jung Pulami
article en

Abstract

This article investigates how the Indo-Pacific has been constructed as a geopolitical region through the discursive and functional practices of China, Japan and the USA. Drawing on constructivism and functionalism, the study analyses government documents, strategic speeches and aid initiatives to uncover divergent regional imaginaries. While Japan and the USA converge on a liberal Indo-Pacific vision, they diverge in tools of implementation, contrasting with China’s sovereignty-driven alternatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative, Global Development Initiative and Digital Silk Road. Functional domains such as infrastructure, digital connectivity and climate cooperation show overlapping scopes but conflicting normative logics. The article also examines how other regional actors such as Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), India, Australia and Pacific Island states accept, reinterpret or contest these visions. Finally, it argues that the Indo- Pacific is not a static construct but a contested space of layered geopolitical imaginations.

Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Constructing the Indo-Pacific: Discursive Power, Functional Cooperation and Competing Regional Imaginaries — Manish Jung Pulami · Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS