More Improved Postoperative Range‐of‐Motion Retention After Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Arthroscopic Fellowship‐Trained Compared With Nonfellowship‐Trained Surgeons

Purpose To describe whether subspecialty training, specifically arthroscopic fellowship training, influences intraoperative range‐of‐motion (ROM) gains, postoperative ROM retention, and lysis of adhesions (LOA) complication rates. Methods Between August 1989 and May 2025, all patients who underwent arthroscopic LOA for stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a single multisite academic institution with a minimum follow‐up of 3 months were reviewed. Cases were stratified by the surgeon's training: 1 group with arthroscopic fellowship training and another with nonarthroscopic or no fellowship training. Primary outcomes were intraoperative ROM change and postoperative ROM retention compared with intraoperative and pre‐TKA baseline values. Revision and periprosthetic joint infection rates were also collected. Results A total of 94 LOA cases were identified, where 48 (51.1%) were performed by nonarthroscopically trained surgeons. Intraoperative ROM improvements were similar between groups in both knee flexion (35.2° arthroscopic vs 31.1° nonarthroscopic, P = .130) and extension (2.43° vs 3.91°, P = .079). Compared with the intraoperative ROM, procedures performed by arthroscopically trained surgeons showed significantly better long‐term retention of both flexion (loss of 4.85° vs 15.98°, P = .006) and extension (gain of 0.50° vs loss of 1.58°, P = .036) at postoperative follow‐up. When compared with preprimary TKA baseline ROM, flexion at follow‐up was slightly improved in the arthroscopic group but declined significantly in the nonarthroscopic group (gain of 1.66° vs loss of 21.76°, P < .001). Eight revision TKAs (8.51%) occurred after LOA, 6 of which involved nonarthroscopic surgeons, and 1 periprosthetic joint infection case was reported. Conclusions LOA performed by arthroscopic fellowship‐trained surgeons results in significantly better retention of postoperative ROM than nonfellowship‐trained surgeons when used for arthrofibrosis after TKA. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70088
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

More Improved Postoperative Range‐of‐Motion Retention After Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Arthroscopic Fellowship‐Trained Compared With Nonfellowship‐Trained Surgeons

Cedric J. Ortiguera, Joshua S. Bingham, Anikar Chhabra, Alexandra M. Cancio-Bello et al.
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

More Improved Postoperative Range‐of‐Motion Retention After Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Arthroscopic Fellowship‐Trained Compared With Nonfellowship‐Trained Surgeons

Cedric J. Ortiguera, Joshua S. Bingham, Anikar Chhabra, Alexandra M. Cancio-Bello, George Bcharah, Calvin Nguyen, Eugenia Lin, Mario Hevesi
article en

Abstract

Purpose To describe whether subspecialty training, specifically arthroscopic fellowship training, influences intraoperative range‐of‐motion (ROM) gains, postoperative ROM retention, and lysis of adhesions (LOA) complication rates. Methods Between August 1989 and May 2025, all patients who underwent arthroscopic LOA for stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a single multisite academic institution with a minimum follow‐up of 3 months were reviewed. Cases were stratified by the surgeon's training: 1 group with arthroscopic fellowship training and another with nonarthroscopic or no fellowship training. Primary outcomes were intraoperative ROM change and postoperative ROM retention compared with intraoperative and pre‐TKA baseline values. Revision and periprosthetic joint infection rates were also collected. Results A total of 94 LOA cases were identified, where 48 (51.1%) were performed by nonarthroscopically trained surgeons. Intraoperative ROM improvements were similar between groups in both knee flexion (35.2° arthroscopic vs 31.1° nonarthroscopic, P = .130) and extension (2.43° vs 3.91°, P = .079). Compared with the intraoperative ROM, procedures performed by arthroscopically trained surgeons showed significantly better long‐term retention of both flexion (loss of 4.85° vs 15.98°, P = .006) and extension (gain of 0.50° vs loss of 1.58°, P = .036) at postoperative follow‐up. When compared with preprimary TKA baseline ROM, flexion at follow‐up was slightly improved in the arthroscopic group but declined significantly in the nonarthroscopic group (gain of 1.66° vs loss of 21.76°, P < .001). Eight revision TKAs (8.51%) occurred after LOA, 6 of which involved nonarthroscopic surgeons, and 1 periprosthetic joint infection case was reported. Conclusions LOA performed by arthroscopic fellowship‐trained surgeons results in significantly better retention of postoperative ROM than nonfellowship‐trained surgeons when used for arthrofibrosis after TKA. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Mayo Clinic (US), Jacksonville College (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.