Impact of model resolution and turbulence scheme on the representation of mountain waves and turbulence

Simulating mountain waves and associated turbulence in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) remains a challenge in numerical weather prediction (NWP). We investigate how the representation of mountain-wave dynamics and turbulence in the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) model depends on model resolution and turbulence parameterization. ICON simulations were performed in NWP mode (ICON-NWP) with varying horizontal (2, 1 km, 500 m) and vertical (400, 200, 100 m) resolutions, using the operational turbulent kinetic energy scheme (ICON-TKE) and the newly developed two-energy turbulence scheme (ICON-2TE). The simulations were evaluated against high-frequency in situ observations from the Deep Propagating Gravity Wave Experiment (DEEPWAVE) over New Zealand on 12 July 2014, as well as a nested large-eddy simulation (ICON-LES) at 130 m resolution. The results show reasonable agreement with observations: ICON-LES more closely captures wavelength and phase, while ICON-NWP better reproduces wave amplitude. Near-convergence of the primary mountain wave and of turbulence structures requires horizontal grid spacings of 1 km or finer and vertical spacings in the UTLS of 200 m or finer, whereas trapped lee waves and downstream wave structure remain resolution-sensitive at these resolutions. Area-averaged, bulk measures allow this convergence behavior to be characterized more systematically: the low-level gravity-wave momentum flux continues to increase with increasing resolution from 1 km to 500 m. A key finding is that both turbulence schemes yield similar wave structures, despite large differences in simulated turbulent kinetic energy. This discrepancy is attributed to the empirical horizontal-shear source term of the operational TKE-scheme configuration, which produces spurious TKE at km-scale resolution. These results provide guidance on the resolution and turbulence representation needed for reliable simulations of small-scale mountain waves and turbulence in the UTLS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13721-2026
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact of model resolution and turbulence scheme on the representation of mountain waves and turbulence

Roshny Siri Jagan, Juerg Schmidli
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Impact of model resolution and turbulence scheme on the representation of mountain waves and turbulence

Roshny Siri Jagan, Juerg Schmidli
article en

Abstract

Simulating mountain waves and associated turbulence in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) remains a challenge in numerical weather prediction (NWP). We investigate how the representation of mountain-wave dynamics and turbulence in the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) model depends on model resolution and turbulence parameterization. ICON simulations were performed in NWP mode (ICON-NWP) with varying horizontal (2, 1 km, 500 m) and vertical (400, 200, 100 m) resolutions, using the operational turbulent kinetic energy scheme (ICON-TKE) and the newly developed two-energy turbulence scheme (ICON-2TE). The simulations were evaluated against high-frequency in situ observations from the Deep Propagating Gravity Wave Experiment (DEEPWAVE) over New Zealand on 12 July 2014, as well as a nested large-eddy simulation (ICON-LES) at 130 m resolution. The results show reasonable agreement with observations: ICON-LES more closely captures wavelength and phase, while ICON-NWP better reproduces wave amplitude. Near-convergence of the primary mountain wave and of turbulence structures requires horizontal grid spacings of 1 km or finer and vertical spacings in the UTLS of 200 m or finer, whereas trapped lee waves and downstream wave structure remain resolution-sensitive at these resolutions. Area-averaged, bulk measures allow this convergence behavior to be characterized more systematically: the low-level gravity-wave momentum flux continues to increase with increasing resolution from 1 km to 500 m. A key finding is that both turbulence schemes yield similar wave structures, despite large differences in simulated turbulent kinetic energy. This discrepancy is attributed to the empirical horizontal-shear source term of the operational TKE-scheme configuration, which produces spurious TKE at km-scale resolution. These results provide guidance on the resolution and turbulence representation needed for reliable simulations of small-scale mountain waves and turbulence in the UTLS.

Atmospheric chemistry and physicsVol. 26(19)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of model resolution and turbulence scheme on the representation of mountain waves and turbulence — Roshny Siri Jagan, Juerg Schmidli · Atmospheric chemistry and physics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS