An Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting among Prescribers in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern India

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a significant global health concern, yet under-reporting persists as a critical pharmacovigilance challenge in developing countries, necessitating evaluation of prescribers' knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAPs) regarding ADR reporting.Objective: To evaluate the KAPs of ADR reporting among prescribers at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern India.Materials and methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted at MGM Medical College and LSK Hospital, Kishanganj, Bihar, from January to February 2024.A validated 19-item KAP questionnaire was administered to prescribers, including faculty, resident doctors, and interns.Knowledge was scored out of 10 points and categorized as poor (0-3), average (4-6), or good (7-10).Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21, with the Chi-square test for categorical variables and appropriate non-parametric tests for continuous data.Results and analysis: Of 274 distributed questionnaires, 168 were returned (61.31% response rate), comprising 43 faculty (25.60%), 74 resident doctors (44.05%), and 51 interns (30.36%).Mean knowledge scores were moderate overall (6.07 ± 1.531), with faculty scoring highest (6.59 ± 1.329), followed by resident doctors (6.07 ± 1.531) and interns (5.62 ± 1.186) (p = 0.002).While 93-99% correctly defined pharmacovigilance, significant knowledge gaps existed regarding banned drugs (p < 0.0001) and institutional monitoring centers (57-72% unaware).Attitudes were predominantly positive, with 90-100% acknowledging reporting necessity, though only 16-60% viewed it as a professional obligation.Most critically, actual reporting practices were severely deficient, with only 16-18% having submitted ADR forms, 69-77% lacking access to reporting forms, and 80-92% never receiving formal training.Conclusion: Despite moderate knowledge and positive attitudes, prescribers demonstrated critically deficient ADR reporting practices due to systemic barriers, including lack of procedural knowledge, limited infrastructure access, and minimal training.Multi-faceted interventions addressing both individual knowledge deficits and institutional barriers are urgently needed to enhance pharmacovigilance and patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bengal Physician Journal
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10070-8142
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

An Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting among Prescribers in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern India

Abhishek Bhattacharjee, Pritama Paul, Sauryadripta Ghose
Bengal Physician Journal
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

An Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting among Prescribers in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern India

Abhishek Bhattacharjee, Pritama Paul, Sauryadripta Ghose
article en

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a significant global health concern, yet under-reporting persists as a critical pharmacovigilance challenge in developing countries, necessitating evaluation of prescribers' knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAPs) regarding ADR reporting.Objective: To evaluate the KAPs of ADR reporting among prescribers at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern India.Materials and methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted at MGM Medical College and LSK Hospital, Kishanganj, Bihar, from January to February 2024.A validated 19-item KAP questionnaire was administered to prescribers, including faculty, resident doctors, and interns.Knowledge was scored out of 10 points and categorized as poor (0-3), average (4-6), or good (7-10).Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21, with the Chi-square test for categorical variables and appropriate non-parametric tests for continuous data.Results and analysis: Of 274 distributed questionnaires, 168 were returned (61.31% response rate), comprising 43 faculty (25.60%), 74 resident doctors (44.05%), and 51 interns (30.36%).Mean knowledge scores were moderate overall (6.07 ± 1.531), with faculty scoring highest (6.59 ± 1.329), followed by resident doctors (6.07 ± 1.531) and interns (5.62 ± 1.186) (p = 0.002).While 93-99% correctly defined pharmacovigilance, significant knowledge gaps existed regarding banned drugs (p < 0.0001) and institutional monitoring centers (57-72% unaware).Attitudes were predominantly positive, with 90-100% acknowledging reporting necessity, though only 16-60% viewed it as a professional obligation.Most critically, actual reporting practices were severely deficient, with only 16-18% having submitted ADR forms, 69-77% lacking access to reporting forms, and 80-92% never receiving formal training.Conclusion: Despite moderate knowledge and positive attitudes, prescribers demonstrated critically deficient ADR reporting practices due to systemic barriers, including lack of procedural knowledge, limited infrastructure access, and minimal training.Multi-faceted interventions addressing both individual knowledge deficits and institutional barriers are urgently needed to enhance pharmacovigilance and patient safety.

Bengal Physician JournalVol. 13(3)
Employees State Insurance Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (IN), Employees' State Insurance Model Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.