Regression Model for a Sensor‐Integrating Jaw Coupling—Compensation for the Viscoelastic Material Behavior

ABSTRACT In recent years, there has been an increasing demand to digitize production processes. In order to obtain the necessary data for these processes, numerous sensors must be installed on or in the machines. This can be difficult, especially when done retroactively, as the existing installation space must be able to accommodate the sensors. To address this issue, sensor‐integrating machine elements are currently being developed. In these machine elements, the sensors are integrated directly into the respective element, and thus enabling a space‐neutral installation. In the current work a sensor‐integrating jaw coupling is investigated. The aim of this coupling is to obtain the transmitted torque via measuring the deformation of the gear rim teeth. For this purpose, dielectric elastomer sensors (DESs), which change their capacitance when deformed, are employed. The functionality of this principle was shown in previous works. The gear rim material has viscoelastic properties. Thus, hysteresis occurs when plotting the torque (the measurand) versus the capacitance (the measured quantity). It follows, that to predict the torque based on the measured capacitance, a regression model is needed. For this task, two approaches are compared with each other: (i) a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), a type of recurrent neural network, and (ii) a physics‐based approach using a combination of analytical models with a GRU. The hyperparameters of the models were determined using the Python library “Optuna.” The models were trained using numerical data of the sensor‐integrating jaw coupling. The two models are compared in terms of the computational time required and their level of accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PAMM
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.70240
Primary Topic
Dielectric materials and actuators
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Regression Model for a Sensor‐Integrating Jaw Coupling—Compensation for the Viscoelastic Material Behavior

Artem Prokopchuk, Johannes D. M. Menning, E.‐F. Markus Vorrath, Arthur Ewert et al.
PAMM
Dielectric materials and actuators
article

Regression Model for a Sensor‐Integrating Jaw Coupling—Compensation for the Viscoelastic Material Behavior

Artem Prokopchuk, Johannes D. M. Menning, E.‐F. Markus Vorrath, Arthur Ewert, Thomas Wallmersperger, Berthold Schlecht
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent years, there has been an increasing demand to digitize production processes. In order to obtain the necessary data for these processes, numerous sensors must be installed on or in the machines. This can be difficult, especially when done retroactively, as the existing installation space must be able to accommodate the sensors. To address this issue, sensor‐integrating machine elements are currently being developed. In these machine elements, the sensors are integrated directly into the respective element, and thus enabling a space‐neutral installation. In the current work a sensor‐integrating jaw coupling is investigated. The aim of this coupling is to obtain the transmitted torque via measuring the deformation of the gear rim teeth. For this purpose, dielectric elastomer sensors (DESs), which change their capacitance when deformed, are employed. The functionality of this principle was shown in previous works. The gear rim material has viscoelastic properties. Thus, hysteresis occurs when plotting the torque (the measurand) versus the capacitance (the measured quantity). It follows, that to predict the torque based on the measured capacitance, a regression model is needed. For this task, two approaches are compared with each other: (i) a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), a type of recurrent neural network, and (ii) a physics‐based approach using a combination of analytical models with a GRU. The hyperparameters of the models were determined using the Python library “Optuna.” The models were trained using numerical data of the sensor‐integrating jaw coupling. The two models are compared in terms of the computational time required and their level of accuracy.

PAMMVol. 26(4)
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dielectric materials and actuators
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.