How pain shapes type 2 diabetes self-management in rural communities: a qualitative study

Rural adults in the Southern U.S. experience disproportionate burdens of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and pain, including chronic pain (CP; ≥ 3 months). These burdens are compounded by structural and economic inequities that may limit access to effective management strategies. This study explored how pain, including chronic pain, shapes diabetes self‑management among rural adults with T2D. Participants were recruited from the Risk Underlying Rural Areas Longitudinal (RURAL) Cohort. Eligible participants had T2D, and pain was assessed using a measure that included past‑week pain severity, presence of pain lasting ≥ 3 months (CP), pain location, pain severity, and pain interference. Focus groups were conducted at a community location in Selma, Alabama. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis. Inter-coder consistency checks and consensus procedures ensured analytic rigor. Two semi‑structured focus groups ( N = 18) were conducted with rural adults with T2D. Twelve participants reported chronic pain, five reported pain, and one reported no current pain. Across discussions, pain emerged as a prominent influence on diabetes self-management, disrupting physical activity, sleep, household tasks, and overall self-care capacity. Additional barriers included psychosocial stress, financial strain, medication burden, and limited access to healthy foods. Participants also described several facilitators of self-management, including adaptive coping strategies, social support from family, coworkers, churches, and community networks, movement as a means of maintaining function, use of alternative remedies, and reliance on faith and spirituality to manage pain and stress. Pain was a salient factor shaping diabetes self-management among rural adults with T2D, although experiences varied in nature and severity. Findings highlight the interconnected social, psychological, and structural factors influencing self-care in rural settings. Future interventions may benefit from addressing shared self-management targets across diabetes and pain, while leveraging existing rural strengths such as social networks, faith communities, and community connectedness. Culturally responsive approaches that address treatment burden, food access, and pain management may improve self-management support for rural populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29612-2
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

How pain shapes type 2 diabetes self-management in rural communities: a qualitative study

Jessica Thames Chambliss, Stephanie Anne Shelton, Nicole E. Werner, Kristen Allen-Watts et al.
BMC Public Health
Diabetes Management and Education
article

How pain shapes type 2 diabetes self-management in rural communities: a qualitative study

Jessica Thames Chambliss, Stephanie Anne Shelton, Nicole E. Werner, Kristen Allen-Watts, Amber W. Kinsey, Ethel Johnson, Taylor L. Taylor, Suzanne Judd, Shelicia Morton-Ford, Clementine Atkinson, Kennedy Butler, Paula Revolte, Misty Hawkins, Kelly NB Palmer, Burel R. Goodin, Andrea Cherrington
article en

Abstract

Rural adults in the Southern U.S. experience disproportionate burdens of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and pain, including chronic pain (CP; ≥ 3 months). These burdens are compounded by structural and economic inequities that may limit access to effective management strategies. This study explored how pain, including chronic pain, shapes diabetes self‑management among rural adults with T2D. Participants were recruited from the Risk Underlying Rural Areas Longitudinal (RURAL) Cohort. Eligible participants had T2D, and pain was assessed using a measure that included past‑week pain severity, presence of pain lasting ≥ 3 months (CP), pain location, pain severity, and pain interference. Focus groups were conducted at a community location in Selma, Alabama. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis. Inter-coder consistency checks and consensus procedures ensured analytic rigor. Two semi‑structured focus groups ( N = 18) were conducted with rural adults with T2D. Twelve participants reported chronic pain, five reported pain, and one reported no current pain. Across discussions, pain emerged as a prominent influence on diabetes self-management, disrupting physical activity, sleep, household tasks, and overall self-care capacity. Additional barriers included psychosocial stress, financial strain, medication burden, and limited access to healthy foods. Participants also described several facilitators of self-management, including adaptive coping strategies, social support from family, coworkers, churches, and community networks, movement as a means of maintaining function, use of alternative remedies, and reliance on faith and spirituality to manage pain and stress. Pain was a salient factor shaping diabetes self-management among rural adults with T2D, although experiences varied in nature and severity. Findings highlight the interconnected social, psychological, and structural factors influencing self-care in rural settings. Future interventions may benefit from addressing shared self-management targets across diabetes and pain, while leveraging existing rural strengths such as social networks, faith communities, and community connectedness. Culturally responsive approaches that address treatment burden, food access, and pain management may improve self-management support for rural populations.

BMC Public Health
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Alabama Department of Public Health (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.