Potential of chrysin for osteogenesis and bone regeneration: a systematic review of preclinical evidence on free chrysin, regenerative systems, concentration responses, mechanisms, and craniofacial relevance

Chrysin (5,7-dihydroxyflavone) has shown osteogenic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities, but evidence on its osteogenic effects, concentration-response patterns, delivery systems, cytotoxicity, and mechanisms remains fragmented. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of chrysin on osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration and to characterize concentration-related responses, safety, delivery approaches, and mechanisms. This systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source via EBSCOhost were searched from inception to 26 April 2026. Eligible studies reported osteogenic differentiation or bone-regeneration outcomes following chrysin-based interventions. Risk of bias was assessed using adapted OHAT and SYRCLE tools. Owing to substantial methodological heterogeneity, the findings were synthesized narratively. Eight studies were included; seven contained in vitro components and three contained animal components. In vitro evidence involved both free and formulated chrysin. The most responsive tested concentrations of free chrysin were 0.01–25 µM across different cell models, while formulated interventions used different nominal concentrations or loading levels. Most studies reported increased osteogenic differentiation, marker expression, or mineralization. None of the animal studies evaluated free chrysin as a standalone intervention; chrysin was assessed within regenerative systems involving pretreated cells, combined DBM/BMSC treatment, or scaffolds. Two animal studies reported improved bone-related outcomes, whereas one showed no significant regenerative benefit. Free chrysin showed osteogenic activity in vitro, while animal studies evaluated chrysin only within regenerative systems. The most responsive tested concentrations varied across biological models and formulations, and the independent in vivo effect of free chrysin remains undetermined. PROSPERO CRD420261332524.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09976-y
Primary Topic
Flavonoids in Medical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Potential of chrysin for osteogenesis and bone regeneration: a systematic review of preclinical evidence on free chrysin, regenerative systems, concentration responses, mechanisms, and craniofacial relevance

Dini Setyowati, Guang Hong, Nafilah Karimah, Mohammad Iqbal et al.
BMC Oral Health
Flavonoids in Medical Research
article

Potential of chrysin for osteogenesis and bone regeneration: a systematic review of preclinical evidence on free chrysin, regenerative systems, concentration responses, mechanisms, and craniofacial relevance

Dini Setyowati, Guang Hong, Nafilah Karimah, Mohammad Iqbal, Asma Suhail, Alexander Patera Nugraha, Tengku Natasha Eleena binti Tengku Noor
article en

Abstract

Chrysin (5,7-dihydroxyflavone) has shown osteogenic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities, but evidence on its osteogenic effects, concentration-response patterns, delivery systems, cytotoxicity, and mechanisms remains fragmented. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of chrysin on osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration and to characterize concentration-related responses, safety, delivery approaches, and mechanisms. This systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source via EBSCOhost were searched from inception to 26 April 2026. Eligible studies reported osteogenic differentiation or bone-regeneration outcomes following chrysin-based interventions. Risk of bias was assessed using adapted OHAT and SYRCLE tools. Owing to substantial methodological heterogeneity, the findings were synthesized narratively. Eight studies were included; seven contained in vitro components and three contained animal components. In vitro evidence involved both free and formulated chrysin. The most responsive tested concentrations of free chrysin were 0.01–25 µM across different cell models, while formulated interventions used different nominal concentrations or loading levels. Most studies reported increased osteogenic differentiation, marker expression, or mineralization. None of the animal studies evaluated free chrysin as a standalone intervention; chrysin was assessed within regenerative systems involving pretreated cells, combined DBM/BMSC treatment, or scaffolds. Two animal studies reported improved bone-related outcomes, whereas one showed no significant regenerative benefit. Free chrysin showed osteogenic activity in vitro, while animal studies evaluated chrysin only within regenerative systems. The most responsive tested concentrations varied across biological models and formulations, and the independent in vivo effect of free chrysin remains undetermined. PROSPERO CRD420261332524.

BMC Oral Health
Tohoku University (JP), Airlangga University (ID), Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Flavonoids in Medical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.