Training and productivity in micro-firms

This paper examines the effect of training on productivity of micro-firms, defined in official statistics as firms with less than 10 employees. While training may represent a crucial mode of knowledge accumulation in micro-firms, which usually lack resources or structure to devote to formal innovation activities, the specificities of micro-businesses suggest that training may even be detrimental to productivity of this category of firms. Yet, the received wisdom that training should foster their productivity, as it does in larger firms, remains un-tested, mainly due to difficulties in previous literature to analyze micro-firms separately from the wider groups of small or small-medium enterprises. Exploiting a unique administrative panel dataset that records training expenses of a large sample of micro-firms located in three Italian regions, we address whether micro-firms which train enjoy a productivity premium vis-a-vis micro-firms that do not. Our main finding, controlling for endogeneity of training via Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjustment methods, combined with firm fixed-effects, is a positive and sizable average treatment effect of training, stable across a series of robustness checks and heterogeneity analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2026.105637
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training and productivity in micro-firms

Federico Tamagni, Marco Rispoli
Research Policy
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

Training and productivity in micro-firms

Federico Tamagni, Marco Rispoli
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of training on productivity of micro-firms, defined in official statistics as firms with less than 10 employees. While training may represent a crucial mode of knowledge accumulation in micro-firms, which usually lack resources or structure to devote to formal innovation activities, the specificities of micro-businesses suggest that training may even be detrimental to productivity of this category of firms. Yet, the received wisdom that training should foster their productivity, as it does in larger firms, remains un-tested, mainly due to difficulties in previous literature to analyze micro-firms separately from the wider groups of small or small-medium enterprises. Exploiting a unique administrative panel dataset that records training expenses of a large sample of micro-firms located in three Italian regions, we address whether micro-firms which train enjoy a productivity premium vis-a-vis micro-firms that do not. Our main finding, controlling for endogeneity of training via Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjustment methods, combined with firm fixed-effects, is a positive and sizable average treatment effect of training, stable across a series of robustness checks and heterogeneity analysis.

Research PolicyVol. 55(10)
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), Prometeia (Italy) (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.