From morphological modules to lineage-derived subindividuals: integrating phenotypic, epigenetic and genetic differentiation in plants

BACKGROUND: Harper's (1977) framing of the plant as a population of semi-autonomous modules remains foundational but predates genomic tools able to test the genetic identity of individual modules. Two further literatures address within-plant heterogeneity largely in parallel: a genetic-mosaicism literature (Gill et al., 1995; Reusch et al., 2021) showing that somatic mutations accumulate within plants, and a subindividual-variation literature (Herrera, 2009; Sobral and Sampedro, 2022) documenting functional consequences of within-plant phenotypic and epigenetic diversity. SCOPE: We bridge these bodies of work within a single lineage-based framework. We define a plant subindividual as a cell-lineage-derived module with a traceable developmental history and partial autonomy, whose differentiation may be expressed at phenotypic, epigenetic and/or genetic levels; detectable somatic genetic divergence is not required for subindividual status. Drawing on whole-genome and methylome studies of long-lived trees, shrubs and clonal crops, we assess the strength of support at each level, distinguishing evidence for the existence of within-plant heterogeneity from evidence for its effects on module function. In the studies reviewed here, a causal link between somatic variants in signalling genes and module-specific physiological responses remains to be established. We then propose a distinct scaling hypothesis: for responses requiring rapid or pathway-specific signalling, increasing transport distance and vascular sectoriality may raise the relative contribution of local regulation-a testable account of why module autonomy may scale with plant size. CONCLUSIONS: Reframing plant modules as lineage-derived subindividuals yields testable predictions comparing genetic, epigenetic and phenotypic differentiation across life histories-from mainly phenotypic and epigenetic differentiation in short-lived herbs to detectable genetic mosaicism in long-lived trees and clonal crops. The framework connects three lines of research and proposes a testable scaling hypothesis for module autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Botany
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag312
Primary Topic
Plant Molecular Biology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From morphological modules to lineage-derived subindividuals: integrating phenotypic, epigenetic and genetic differentiation in plants

Naibin Duan, Zezhou Liu, Yumin Ma, Suping Kong et al.
Annals of Botany
Plant Molecular Biology Research
article

From morphological modules to lineage-derived subindividuals: integrating phenotypic, epigenetic and genetic differentiation in plants

Naibin Duan, Zezhou Liu, Yumin Ma, Suping Kong, Xinguo Li
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Harper's (1977) framing of the plant as a population of semi-autonomous modules remains foundational but predates genomic tools able to test the genetic identity of individual modules. Two further literatures address within-plant heterogeneity largely in parallel: a genetic-mosaicism literature (Gill et al., 1995; Reusch et al., 2021) showing that somatic mutations accumulate within plants, and a subindividual-variation literature (Herrera, 2009; Sobral and Sampedro, 2022) documenting functional consequences of within-plant phenotypic and epigenetic diversity. SCOPE: We bridge these bodies of work within a single lineage-based framework. We define a plant subindividual as a cell-lineage-derived module with a traceable developmental history and partial autonomy, whose differentiation may be expressed at phenotypic, epigenetic and/or genetic levels; detectable somatic genetic divergence is not required for subindividual status. Drawing on whole-genome and methylome studies of long-lived trees, shrubs and clonal crops, we assess the strength of support at each level, distinguishing evidence for the existence of within-plant heterogeneity from evidence for its effects on module function. In the studies reviewed here, a causal link between somatic variants in signalling genes and module-specific physiological responses remains to be established. We then propose a distinct scaling hypothesis: for responses requiring rapid or pathway-specific signalling, increasing transport distance and vascular sectoriality may raise the relative contribution of local regulation-a testable account of why module autonomy may scale with plant size. CONCLUSIONS: Reframing plant modules as lineage-derived subindividuals yields testable predictions comparing genetic, epigenetic and phenotypic differentiation across life histories-from mainly phenotypic and epigenetic differentiation in short-lived herbs to detectable genetic mosaicism in long-lived trees and clonal crops. The framework connects three lines of research and proposes a testable scaling hypothesis for module autonomy.

Annals of Botany
Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Plant Molecular Biology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.