Mechanical Comparison of Graphene with Polyetheretherketone and Titanium for Dental Implant Applications

Objectives: The long-term success of implant-supported prostheses and load-bearing implant systems depends on the mechanical properties of advanced structured biomaterials. Graphene has long been used in graphene-based composites; however, the mechanical characteristics of graphene as a standalone structured material are not well understood. Since comparative mechanical characterization across nano-structured, polymeric, and metallic biomaterials is necessary for interdisciplinary materials development, this study compares the flexural strength and surface hardness of graphene with Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium, which are widely used implant biomaterials. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 specimens (n=10 for graphene, PEEK, and titanium) were milled using CAD/CAM technology according to ISO 178 for flexural strength and ISO 6507-1 for Vickers hardness. Flexural strength was measured with a three-point bending test at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min to assess the flexural strength of the samples. Surface hardness was tested on the same samples by using a microhardness tester. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test. Effect sizes were calculated using eta squared (ƞ2). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: The mechanical performance parameters, mean flexural strength (F (2,27) = 4433.2, p

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1903706
Primary Topic
Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Mechanical Comparison of Graphene with Polyetheretherketone and Titanium for Dental Implant Applications

Sravalli Kodipalli, Ireddy Kavya Sri, Chikkam Bindhu Sree, Ram Basany et al.
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
article

Mechanical Comparison of Graphene with Polyetheretherketone and Titanium for Dental Implant Applications

Sravalli Kodipalli, Ireddy Kavya Sri, Chikkam Bindhu Sree, Ram Basany, Badugu Satyavathi
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The long-term success of implant-supported prostheses and load-bearing implant systems depends on the mechanical properties of advanced structured biomaterials. Graphene has long been used in graphene-based composites; however, the mechanical characteristics of graphene as a standalone structured material are not well understood. Since comparative mechanical characterization across nano-structured, polymeric, and metallic biomaterials is necessary for interdisciplinary materials development, this study compares the flexural strength and surface hardness of graphene with Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium, which are widely used implant biomaterials. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 specimens (n=10 for graphene, PEEK, and titanium) were milled using CAD/CAM technology according to ISO 178 for flexural strength and ISO 6507-1 for Vickers hardness. Flexural strength was measured with a three-point bending test at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min to assess the flexural strength of the samples. Surface hardness was tested on the same samples by using a microhardness tester. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test. Effect sizes were calculated using eta squared (ƞ2). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: The mechanical performance parameters, mean flexural strength (F (2,27) = 4433.2, p

Cumhuriyet Dental JournalVol. 29(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.