Thermodynamic and efficiency optimization of the Allam Cycle with and without exhaust gas recompression

This work focuses on the comparison between two patented configurations of the Allam Cycle: the basic scheme and the recompressed one. The two Allam cycle schemes, including the cryogenic CO 2 purification and compression unit, have been accurately modelled with Aspen Plus v14. For each scheme, two cases are studied: a case featuring heat integration with the Air Separation Unit and a case without external heat supply. The independent cycle design variables (pressures, temperatures) are numerically optimized to maximize the net electric plant efficiency. The results indicate that, without external heat integration, the cycle with exhaust gas recompression achieves net electric efficiency considerably higher than the basic cycle (48.2 % vs. 51.3 %). However, the efficiency advantage of the recompressed cycle diminishes in the case with external heat integration (51.5 % vs. 53.3 %). When the external heat is further increased, the efficiency of the two cycles tend to converge to approximately 55 %. Sensitivity analyses are also conducted to assess the impact of the performance of the main components (compressors, turbine, air separation unit, heat exchangers) on the efficiency of the two cycle schemes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.141111
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Thermodynamic and efficiency optimization of the Allam Cycle with and without exhaust gas recompression

Emanuele Martelli, Lorenzo Sala, Alessandro Colnago, Emanuela Alfarano
Fuel
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Thermodynamic and efficiency optimization of the Allam Cycle with and without exhaust gas recompression

Emanuele Martelli, Lorenzo Sala, Alessandro Colnago, Emanuela Alfarano
article en

Abstract

This work focuses on the comparison between two patented configurations of the Allam Cycle: the basic scheme and the recompressed one. The two Allam cycle schemes, including the cryogenic CO 2 purification and compression unit, have been accurately modelled with Aspen Plus v14. For each scheme, two cases are studied: a case featuring heat integration with the Air Separation Unit and a case without external heat supply. The independent cycle design variables (pressures, temperatures) are numerically optimized to maximize the net electric plant efficiency. The results indicate that, without external heat integration, the cycle with exhaust gas recompression achieves net electric efficiency considerably higher than the basic cycle (48.2 % vs. 51.3 %). However, the efficiency advantage of the recompressed cycle diminishes in the case with external heat integration (51.5 % vs. 53.3 %). When the external heat is further increased, the efficiency of the two cycles tend to converge to approximately 55 %. Sensitivity analyses are also conducted to assess the impact of the performance of the main components (compressors, turbine, air separation unit, heat exchangers) on the efficiency of the two cycle schemes.

FuelVol. 430
Baker Hughes (United States) (US), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Thermodynamic and efficiency optimization of the Allam Cycle with and without exhaust gas recompression — Emanuele Martelli, Lorenzo Sala, et al. · Fuel (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS