Riots, ruptures and power contests under Prabowo

Indonesia has witnessed waves of protests in response to anti-democratic policies, culminating in violent riots, as in August 2025. Traditional views see riots as criminal disorder, while social movement scholars interpret them as protest repertoires. Both perspectives tend to portray protests-turned-riots as mainly reflecting the agency of societal actors, either adversely or sympathetically. Our findings suggest that, as contending political elites often influence such escalations – especially when the interests of certain factions are at stake – riots are better understood as a rupture, an event that creates openings for extra-institutional spaces where multiple actors recalibrate their strategic positions. Therefore, attributing violence solely to economic factors or protest tactics, as observers suggest, overlooks aspects of power contests among dominant political forces that often exploit social unrest for strategic gains. The current contests intensified as rival factions were marginalised following President Prabowo Subianto's attempts to further re-centralise power and dismantle old patronage networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034261495053
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Riots, ruptures and power contests under Prabowo

Abdil Mughis Mudhoffir, Rafiqa Qurrata A'yun, Ary Hermawan
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Asian Studies and History
article

Riots, ruptures and power contests under Prabowo

Abdil Mughis Mudhoffir, Rafiqa Qurrata A'yun, Ary Hermawan
article en

Abstract

Indonesia has witnessed waves of protests in response to anti-democratic policies, culminating in violent riots, as in August 2025. Traditional views see riots as criminal disorder, while social movement scholars interpret them as protest repertoires. Both perspectives tend to portray protests-turned-riots as mainly reflecting the agency of societal actors, either adversely or sympathetically. Our findings suggest that, as contending political elites often influence such escalations – especially when the interests of certain factions are at stake – riots are better understood as a rupture, an event that creates openings for extra-institutional spaces where multiple actors recalibrate their strategic positions. Therefore, attributing violence solely to economic factors or protest tactics, as observers suggest, overlooks aspects of power contests among dominant political forces that often exploit social unrest for strategic gains. The current contests intensified as rival factions were marginalised following President Prabowo Subianto's attempts to further re-centralise power and dismantle old patronage networks.

Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
The University of Melbourne (AU), German Institute for Global and Area Studies (DE), University of Indonesia (ID), ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute (SG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.