Effect of Nebulizer Breath-Guiding on Breathing Patterns and Lung Deposition

Background: Efficient aerosol therapy depends on both device performance and inhalation technique. Breath-triggered vibrating mesh nebulizers reduce drug loss by generating aerosol only during inspiration but may prolong treatment. Guiding patients toward slow, deep breathing could improve lung deposition and shorten nebulization time, yet quantitative evidence, particularly across disease groups, remains limited. Objective: To assess how integrated breath-guiding features influence breathing behavior, lung deposition, and user perception in healthy adults and in patients with obstructive or restrictive lung disease. Methods: Sixty-four participants inhaled through three nebulizer configurations: a low-resistance reference (eFlow OS) and two versions of the eFlow Integrated featuring direction-dependent resistance and multimodal feedback, tested with or without a breath-guiding app. Flow signals from multiple breaths were analyzed to determine phase-averaged breathing parameters. Device effects were evaluated by ANOVA. Representative breathing patterns and unsteady aerosol characteristics were input to a validated whole-lung in silico model to estimate deposition. User experience was assessed by questionnaire. Results: Breath-guiding consistently altered inhalation behavior. Peak inspiratory flow decreased by ∼20%, the I/E ratio increased by >15%, and with the breath guide app, tidal volume (+40%) and breath duration (+47%) increased. These effects were similar across disease groups. In silico simulations showed improved delivery with guided inhalation: lung drug deposition rate increased by 3.7% and 15.5%, and alveolar deposited mass fraction rose by 66% and 76% versus the reference. The breath guide app further shifted deposition from extrathoracic to thoracic and alveolar regions and reduced exhalation losses (–14%). Most participants (88%) were satisfied or very satisfied, citing pleasant resistance and helpful app guidance. Conclusion: Breath-guiding features and digital coaching reliably promote slower, deeper breathing, leading to greater lung and alveolar deposition and shorter expected nebulization times. High user acceptance underscores the clinical potential of patient-centric, guided inhalation in optimizing aerosol therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711261488960
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effect of Nebulizer Breath-Guiding on Breathing Patterns and Lung Deposition

Maximilian J. Grill, Jakob Richter, Uwe Schuschnig, Lea Botermann et al.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
article

Effect of Nebulizer Breath-Guiding on Breathing Patterns and Lung Deposition

Maximilian J. Grill, Jakob Richter, Uwe Schuschnig, Lea Botermann, Benjamin Heine, Nicolas Schwenck, Andreas Liebl, Michael Hahn, Gesa Bräunlich
article en

Abstract

Background: Efficient aerosol therapy depends on both device performance and inhalation technique. Breath-triggered vibrating mesh nebulizers reduce drug loss by generating aerosol only during inspiration but may prolong treatment. Guiding patients toward slow, deep breathing could improve lung deposition and shorten nebulization time, yet quantitative evidence, particularly across disease groups, remains limited. Objective: To assess how integrated breath-guiding features influence breathing behavior, lung deposition, and user perception in healthy adults and in patients with obstructive or restrictive lung disease. Methods: Sixty-four participants inhaled through three nebulizer configurations: a low-resistance reference (eFlow OS) and two versions of the eFlow Integrated featuring direction-dependent resistance and multimodal feedback, tested with or without a breath-guiding app. Flow signals from multiple breaths were analyzed to determine phase-averaged breathing parameters. Device effects were evaluated by ANOVA. Representative breathing patterns and unsteady aerosol characteristics were input to a validated whole-lung in silico model to estimate deposition. User experience was assessed by questionnaire. Results: Breath-guiding consistently altered inhalation behavior. Peak inspiratory flow decreased by ∼20%, the I/E ratio increased by >15%, and with the breath guide app, tidal volume (+40%) and breath duration (+47%) increased. These effects were similar across disease groups. In silico simulations showed improved delivery with guided inhalation: lung drug deposition rate increased by 3.7% and 15.5%, and alveolar deposited mass fraction rose by 66% and 76% versus the reference. The breath guide app further shifted deposition from extrathoracic to thoracic and alveolar regions and reduced exhalation losses (–14%). Most participants (88%) were satisfied or very satisfied, citing pleasant resistance and helpful app guidance. Conclusion: Breath-guiding features and digital coaching reliably promote slower, deeper breathing, leading to greater lung and alveolar deposition and shorter expected nebulization times. High user acceptance underscores the clinical potential of patient-centric, guided inhalation in optimizing aerosol therapy.

Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery
PARI (Germany) (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.