I regulate my emotions; therefore, I am creative? Daily emotion regulation and workplace creativity

Purpose Evidence on the daily within-person relationship between emotion regulation strategies and creativity remains limited, particularly in non-service contexts. This study addresses this gap by examining the indirect relationship between day-level deep and surface acting and creativity via positive affect, and the moderating role of emotion regulation ability. Design/methodology/approach One-week diary study of 103 employees, analyzed using multilevel structural equation modeling. Findings Day-level deep acting was indirectly related to day-level creativity through positive affect, whereas surface acting showed the opposite pattern. Emotion regulation ability amplified the positive affective outcomes of day-level deep acting but did not buffer the negative effects of surface acting. Originality/value By examining how day-level deep and surface acting indirectly relate to creativity via positive affect in a non-service context, this study addresses a gap in research on day-level emotion regulation and creativity. Integrating broaden-and-build theory with emotion regulation research, it highlights emotion regulation ability as a personal resource amplifying the positive affective outcomes of deep acting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-03-2025-0265
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

I regulate my emotions; therefore, I am creative? Daily emotion regulation and workplace creativity

Marius Wehner, Lynn Schmodde
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

I regulate my emotions; therefore, I am creative? Daily emotion regulation and workplace creativity

Marius Wehner, Lynn Schmodde
article en

Abstract

Purpose Evidence on the daily within-person relationship between emotion regulation strategies and creativity remains limited, particularly in non-service contexts. This study addresses this gap by examining the indirect relationship between day-level deep and surface acting and creativity via positive affect, and the moderating role of emotion regulation ability. Design/methodology/approach One-week diary study of 103 employees, analyzed using multilevel structural equation modeling. Findings Day-level deep acting was indirectly related to day-level creativity through positive affect, whereas surface acting showed the opposite pattern. Emotion regulation ability amplified the positive affective outcomes of day-level deep acting but did not buffer the negative effects of surface acting. Originality/value By examining how day-level deep and surface acting indirectly relate to creativity via positive affect in a non-service context, this study addresses a gap in research on day-level emotion regulation and creativity. Integrating broaden-and-build theory with emotion regulation research, it highlights emotion regulation ability as a personal resource amplifying the positive affective outcomes of deep acting.

Journal of Managerial Psychology
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

I regulate my emotions; therefore, I am creative? Daily emotion regulation and workplace creativity — Marius Wehner, Lynn Schmodde · Journal of Managerial Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS