Time and Money: Patterns of Nonstandard Work Across the First Year of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic had a well-documented impact on the formal economy, with the extent of these consequences varying across industries and sociodemographic groups. Less attention has been paid to whether the nonstandard economy, including informal and gig work, mirrored this broader economic fallout. We draw on 2019 and 2020 data from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking to assess participation in, time spent on, and money earned from nonstandard work across the first year of the pandemic. We find evidence of an overall decline in participation in nonstandard work during this time. However, our results indicate heterogeneous experiences across nonstandard workers: while almost 30 percent reported decreases in time spent on and money earned from nonstandard work activities, roughly a quarter reported increased time and profits. These patterns further diverge across sociodemographic characteristics and types of work activities. Our findings offer insight into the distinctiveness of the nonstandard economy across the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, with patterns that vary from the formal labor market. These findings further discourage viewing nonstandard work as a substitute for the formal economy during a period of economic crisis, as not all workers may have the monetary or technological capital that facilitates increased profits from nonstandard work activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Midwest Social Sciences Journal
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22543/2766-0796.1216
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Time and Money: Patterns of Nonstandard Work Across the First Year of COVID-19

Alison Winiarski, Ellen M. Whitehead, Emily Wornell, Justin Schupp
Midwest Social Sciences Journal
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Time and Money: Patterns of Nonstandard Work Across the First Year of COVID-19

Alison Winiarski, Ellen M. Whitehead, Emily Wornell, Justin Schupp
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic had a well-documented impact on the formal economy, with the extent of these consequences varying across industries and sociodemographic groups. Less attention has been paid to whether the nonstandard economy, including informal and gig work, mirrored this broader economic fallout. We draw on 2019 and 2020 data from the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking to assess participation in, time spent on, and money earned from nonstandard work across the first year of the pandemic. We find evidence of an overall decline in participation in nonstandard work during this time. However, our results indicate heterogeneous experiences across nonstandard workers: while almost 30 percent reported decreases in time spent on and money earned from nonstandard work activities, roughly a quarter reported increased time and profits. These patterns further diverge across sociodemographic characteristics and types of work activities. Our findings offer insight into the distinctiveness of the nonstandard economy across the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, with patterns that vary from the formal labor market. These findings further discourage viewing nonstandard work as a substitute for the formal economy during a period of economic crisis, as not all workers may have the monetary or technological capital that facilitates increased profits from nonstandard work activities.

Midwest Social Sciences JournalVol. 29(1)
Ball State University (US), Wheaton College - Massachusetts (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.