Multi‐Modal Transformer Framework for Automated Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading From Radiographs

ABSTRACT To develop and validate a multi‐modal, artificial intelligence (AI)‐driven framework for automated grading of knee osteoarthritis severity from radiographs, integrating advanced detection, deep learning, radiomics, and clinical data. A total of 2290 patients from five medical centers were included, split into an internal cohort ( n = 1549) and an external test set ( n = 741). Knee radiographs were preprocessed with histogram normalization, contrast‐limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), and noise filtering. Four detection models, RT‐DETR, SAM, DINOv2 + ViTDet, and Grounded‐SAM/MedSAM, were evaluated for anatomical localization, with Grounded‐SAM/MedSAM selected for optimal intersection over union (IoU) and mean average precision (mAP). Radiomic features ( n = 215) were extracted from detected regions of interest (ROIs) using the Standardized Environment for Radiomics Analysis (SERA) platform, while deep features were derived from four advanced extractors, with MedSAM + feature aggregator selected for highest classification accuracy. Features underwent harmonization, variance filtering, and selection via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), principal component analysis (PCA), or mutual information. Clinical, radiomic, and deep features were fused and classified using CoAtNet, ConvNeXt V2, EfficientNetV2, RepLKNet, and Swin V2 Transformers. Model selection was performed within a nested cross‐validation scheme on the internal cohort, and the external cohort was accessed only once after the final configuration had been fixed. Model performance was assessed by accuracy, F1‐score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with interpretability provided by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and a nomogram. Grounded‐SAM/MedSAM achieved the highest detection performance (external IoU = 90.83% [95% confidence interval, CI, 89.41–92.15], mAP = 93.67% [95% CI 92.38–94.82]). MedSAM deep features outperformed others (external F1 = 82.37% [95% CI 80.56–84.18], AUC = 0.902 [95% CI 0.888–0.916]). Fused features with Swin V2 + LASSO yielded the best results (external accuracy = 94.6% [95% CI 93.5–95.7], F1 = 94.4% [95% CI 93.3–95.5], AUC = 97.2% [95% CI 96.4–98.0]), significantly surpassing single‐modality models. SHAP analysis confirmed balanced contributions from deep, radiomic, and clinical features, while the nomogram achieved a C‐index of 0.970 [95% CI 0.958–0.980] with excellent calibration. This framework demonstrates high accuracy, robustness, and interpretability in knee osteoarthritis severity grading from radiographs, offering strong potential for real‐world clinical integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.70450
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multi‐Modal Transformer Framework for Automated Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading From Radiographs

Li Zhao, Changshuang Bai, ZhaoXue Li, Qiang Yue et al.
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Multi‐Modal Transformer Framework for Automated Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading From Radiographs

Li Zhao, Changshuang Bai, ZhaoXue Li, Qiang Yue, Qian Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT To develop and validate a multi‐modal, artificial intelligence (AI)‐driven framework for automated grading of knee osteoarthritis severity from radiographs, integrating advanced detection, deep learning, radiomics, and clinical data. A total of 2290 patients from five medical centers were included, split into an internal cohort ( n = 1549) and an external test set ( n = 741). Knee radiographs were preprocessed with histogram normalization, contrast‐limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), and noise filtering. Four detection models, RT‐DETR, SAM, DINOv2 + ViTDet, and Grounded‐SAM/MedSAM, were evaluated for anatomical localization, with Grounded‐SAM/MedSAM selected for optimal intersection over union (IoU) and mean average precision (mAP). Radiomic features ( n = 215) were extracted from detected regions of interest (ROIs) using the Standardized Environment for Radiomics Analysis (SERA) platform, while deep features were derived from four advanced extractors, with MedSAM + feature aggregator selected for highest classification accuracy. Features underwent harmonization, variance filtering, and selection via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), principal component analysis (PCA), or mutual information. Clinical, radiomic, and deep features were fused and classified using CoAtNet, ConvNeXt V2, EfficientNetV2, RepLKNet, and Swin V2 Transformers. Model selection was performed within a nested cross‐validation scheme on the internal cohort, and the external cohort was accessed only once after the final configuration had been fixed. Model performance was assessed by accuracy, F1‐score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with interpretability provided by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and a nomogram. Grounded‐SAM/MedSAM achieved the highest detection performance (external IoU = 90.83% [95% confidence interval, CI, 89.41–92.15], mAP = 93.67% [95% CI 92.38–94.82]). MedSAM deep features outperformed others (external F1 = 82.37% [95% CI 80.56–84.18], AUC = 0.902 [95% CI 0.888–0.916]). Fused features with Swin V2 + LASSO yielded the best results (external accuracy = 94.6% [95% CI 93.5–95.7], F1 = 94.4% [95% CI 93.3–95.5], AUC = 97.2% [95% CI 96.4–98.0]), significantly surpassing single‐modality models. SHAP analysis confirmed balanced contributions from deep, radiomic, and clinical features, while the nomogram achieved a C‐index of 0.970 [95% CI 0.958–0.980] with excellent calibration. This framework demonstrates high accuracy, robustness, and interpretability in knee osteoarthritis severity grading from radiographs, offering strong potential for real‐world clinical integration.

International Journal of Imaging Systems and TechnologyVol. 36(6)
Beihua University (CN), Xuzhou Medical College (CN), Jilin City Central Hospital (CN), Second People’s Hospital of Huai’an (CN), Xuzhou Central Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.