Equitable Language Access in Neonatal Research

Participation in neonatal randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is associated with improved or equivalent outcomes for infants and is widely viewed as a cornerstone of high-quality neonatal care. Equitable access to research participation is therefore essential to scientific validity, ethical integrity, and generalizability. Although substantial efforts have focused on improving the representation of racial and ethnic minority groups in neonatal research, the inclusion of families who speak languages other than English remains inadequately examined. In this perspective, we synthesize existing evidence on language-based exclusion in pediatric research and present findings from systematic reviews of neonatal RCT protocols and informed consent materials from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (1991–2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov (2018–2025). We discuss regulatory, institutional, and structural factors contributing to language exclusion and highlight actionable strategies to promote language-inclusive research, including strengthened federal regulations, investment in equitable language access, language-inclusive study design, systematic documentation of participant language, and meaningful community engagement. Advancing language equity in neonatal research is critical to improving representation, strengthening scientific validity and ensuring that the benefits of research extend to all infants and families.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeoReviews
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.27-10-052
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Equitable Language Access in Neonatal Research

Carl H. Backes, Sydney Green, Cara Boyle
NeoReviews
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Equitable Language Access in Neonatal Research

Carl H. Backes, Sydney Green, Cara Boyle
article en

Abstract

Participation in neonatal randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is associated with improved or equivalent outcomes for infants and is widely viewed as a cornerstone of high-quality neonatal care. Equitable access to research participation is therefore essential to scientific validity, ethical integrity, and generalizability. Although substantial efforts have focused on improving the representation of racial and ethnic minority groups in neonatal research, the inclusion of families who speak languages other than English remains inadequately examined. In this perspective, we synthesize existing evidence on language-based exclusion in pediatric research and present findings from systematic reviews of neonatal RCT protocols and informed consent materials from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (1991–2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov (2018–2025). We discuss regulatory, institutional, and structural factors contributing to language exclusion and highlight actionable strategies to promote language-inclusive research, including strengthened federal regulations, investment in equitable language access, language-inclusive study design, systematic documentation of participant language, and meaningful community engagement. Advancing language equity in neonatal research is critical to improving representation, strengthening scientific validity and ensuring that the benefits of research extend to all infants and families.

NeoReviewsVol. 27(10)
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.