Beyond the Monolayer: Leveraging 3D Culture Systems to Decode Mechanisms of Drug Resistance and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Colorectal Cancer

ABSTRACT Two‐dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures remain the workhorse of colorectal cancer (CRC) research and high‐throughput screening (HTS), yet they poorly recapitulate tissue architecture, extracellular matrix (ECM) cues, metabolic gradients, and multicellular heterogeneity that govern drug response in vivo. Over the past decade, three‐dimensional (3D) culture systems—including spheroids, patient‐derived organoids (PDOs), tissue‐originated spheroids (CTOS), and collagen‐embedded models—have revealed striking 2D vs. 3D discordance in proliferation, signaling, epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT), plasticity, and sensitivity to standard chemo‐ and targeted therapies. This review synthesizes how 3D CRC models are used to decode mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to anti‐CRC therapies, from metabolic phenotypes and ECM remodeling to EMT, polarity loss, and rare invasive trajectories identified by imaging and quantification of morphologic features of CRC cells grown in 3D. Parallel advances in PDO‐based functional precision oncology demonstrate that organoid drug screens can prospectively predict patient response in advanced CRC, while 3D combination screens uncover format‐specific synergies that are invisible in 2D. Building on this foundation, we highlight recent technical innovations and discuss how integrating morphometric, metabolic, and trajectory‐level readouts can move CRC drug discovery “beyond live/dead.” Rather than propose a single best model, we outline practical guidelines for matching 3D platform choice (cell lines vs. PDO/CTOS, collagen vs. Matrigel, static vs. live‐imaging HTS) to mechanistic questions and therapeutic goals in CRC. We propose an integrated roadmap—matrix‐embedded 3D cultures, high‐content morphological endpoints, trajectory analytics, and rigorous HTS validation—to decode resistance mechanisms and prioritize clinically actionable combinations in CRC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72305
Primary Topic
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Beyond the Monolayer: Leveraging 3D Culture Systems to Decode Mechanisms of Drug Resistance and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Colorectal Cancer

Sarah J. Harmych, Bhuminder Singh
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
article

Beyond the Monolayer: Leveraging 3D Culture Systems to Decode Mechanisms of Drug Resistance and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Colorectal Cancer

Sarah J. Harmych, Bhuminder Singh
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two‐dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures remain the workhorse of colorectal cancer (CRC) research and high‐throughput screening (HTS), yet they poorly recapitulate tissue architecture, extracellular matrix (ECM) cues, metabolic gradients, and multicellular heterogeneity that govern drug response in vivo. Over the past decade, three‐dimensional (3D) culture systems—including spheroids, patient‐derived organoids (PDOs), tissue‐originated spheroids (CTOS), and collagen‐embedded models—have revealed striking 2D vs. 3D discordance in proliferation, signaling, epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT), plasticity, and sensitivity to standard chemo‐ and targeted therapies. This review synthesizes how 3D CRC models are used to decode mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to anti‐CRC therapies, from metabolic phenotypes and ECM remodeling to EMT, polarity loss, and rare invasive trajectories identified by imaging and quantification of morphologic features of CRC cells grown in 3D. Parallel advances in PDO‐based functional precision oncology demonstrate that organoid drug screens can prospectively predict patient response in advanced CRC, while 3D combination screens uncover format‐specific synergies that are invisible in 2D. Building on this foundation, we highlight recent technical innovations and discuss how integrating morphometric, metabolic, and trajectory‐level readouts can move CRC drug discovery “beyond live/dead.” Rather than propose a single best model, we outline practical guidelines for matching 3D platform choice (cell lines vs. PDO/CTOS, collagen vs. Matrigel, static vs. live‐imaging HTS) to mechanistic questions and therapeutic goals in CRC. We propose an integrated roadmap—matrix‐embedded 3D cultures, high‐content morphological endpoints, trajectory analytics, and rigorous HTS validation—to decode resistance mechanisms and prioritize clinically actionable combinations in CRC.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(10)
Vanderbilt University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cancer Cells and Metastasis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.